2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.03.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prophylaxis Versus Placebo Treatment for Infective and Inflammatory Complications of Surgical Third Molar Removal: A Split-Mouth, Double-Blind, Controlled, Clinical Trial With Amoxicillin (500 mg)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
39
1
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
39
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Those authors [11] also observed no significant difference in the level of edema between groups and concerning pain a significant difference was observed between groups only on day 7 of evaluation. According to Lacasa et al [27] for M3 surgeries there was a trend of higher infection rates when compared placebo (16%; 12/75) vesus prophylaxis (5.3%; 4/75; two active amoxicillin/ clavulanate 1000/62.5 mg tablets in a single dose before surgery), however not significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Those authors [11] also observed no significant difference in the level of edema between groups and concerning pain a significant difference was observed between groups only on day 7 of evaluation. According to Lacasa et al [27] for M3 surgeries there was a trend of higher infection rates when compared placebo (16%; 12/75) vesus prophylaxis (5.3%; 4/75; two active amoxicillin/ clavulanate 1000/62.5 mg tablets in a single dose before surgery), however not significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Bezerra et al [11] compared amoxicillin versus placebo for M3 surgeries and although 50% of those patients presented inflammatory/infectious events the incidence did not differ significantly between the experimental and control groups. Those authors [11] also observed no significant difference in the level of edema between groups and concerning pain a significant difference was observed between groups only on day 7 of evaluation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(46,47,55) Entretanto, outros trabalhos de investigação científica relataram não existir evidências científicas comprovando tal eficácia. (32,45,49,51,52,56,57) No contexto das exodontias de terceiros molares, o uso de antibióticos deve ser considerado apenas quando o paciente apresentar sintomatologia prévia, posição desfavorável do órgão dentário, necessidade de osteotomia e odontossecção, tempo cirúrgico estendido, deficiente higiene oral ou idade avançada. (17) Assim, a prescrição antibiótica não deve ser indicada em todas as condições clínicas sendo necessário avaliar fatores tais como a condição sistêmica do paciente, habilidades profissionais, e contaminação no ambiente cirúrgico.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…When compared to prospective studies, higher rates of infection have been reported by RCT with (up to 7.22%) and without (up to 16.55%) prophylactic antibiotics, as summarized by a recent systematic review . In addition to postoperative infection, RCT report on a number of postoperative outcomes and symptoms, including pain, edema, erythema, trismus, pyrexia, and dysphagia . Criteria for classifying infections are indistinct in many RCT, and might have contributed to the higher reported infection rates …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 In addition to postoperative infection, RCT report on a number of postoperative outcomes and symptoms, including pain, edema, erythema, trismus, pyrexia, and dysphagia. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21] Criteria for classifying infections are indistinct in many RCT, and might have contributed to the higher reported infection rates. 6 Although RCT occupy the highest level in the hierarchy of evidence, 22 they might not be the best methodology to study rare exposures or conditions where randomization is not ethical or practical, 23 and might not reflect the real-life situation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%