2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-011-2355-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proportional incidence and radiological review of large (T2+) breast cancers as surrogate indicators of screening programme performance

Abstract: • Interval breast cancers, assumed as screening failures, are monitored to estimate screening performance • Large (T2+) cancers at screening may also represent failed prior screening detection • Analysis of T2+ lesions may be more feasible than assessing interval cancers • Analysis of T2+ cancers is a potential further measure of screening performance.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present study had individual data available for a large cohort of women who regularly responded to three of the biennial invitations of the Germen MSP. It differs from previous study with individual data [4][5][6][7] in that it employedto our knowledge for the first time -the methods suggested by the EU guidelines: the ABC incidence in a cohort of regular screening participants was compared with the reference incidence of ABC in the period prior to the start of the MSP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The present study had individual data available for a large cohort of women who regularly responded to three of the biennial invitations of the Germen MSP. It differs from previous study with individual data [4][5][6][7] in that it employedto our knowledge for the first time -the methods suggested by the EU guidelines: the ABC incidence in a cohort of regular screening participants was compared with the reference incidence of ABC in the period prior to the start of the MSP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, despite large methodological differences (e.g., definition of ABC, definition of screening attender, duration of follow-up, etc. ), all five studies observed reductions in the ABC incidence of screening attenders compared to non-attenders [4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation