2010
DOI: 10.1109/tac.2010.2045693
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proportional-Integral Controllers for Minimum-Phase Nonaffine-in-Control Systems

Abstract: Abstract-We show that stabilizing tracking proportional-integral (PI) controllers can be constructed for minimum-phase nonaffine-in-control systems. The constructed PI controller is an equivalent realization of an approximate dynamic inversion controller. This equivalence holds only for the time response when applied to the unperturbed system. Even when restricted to unperturbed minimum-phase linear time invariant systems, their closed loop robustness properties differ. This shows that in general, properties t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, by choosing a special filter, the proposed controllers can be finally replaced by proportional-integral (PI) controllers. This is consistent with the controller form in [16] for a similar problem. However, compared with [16], the considered plant, analysis method and design procedure are all different, especially the analysis method and design procedure.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, by choosing a special filter, the proposed controllers can be finally replaced by proportional-integral (PI) controllers. This is consistent with the controller form in [16] for a similar problem. However, compared with [16], the considered plant, analysis method and design procedure are all different, especially the analysis method and design procedure.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This is consistent with the controller form in [16] for a similar problem. However, compared with [16], the considered plant, analysis method and design procedure are all different, especially the analysis method and design procedure. The bound on a parameter, corresponding to the singular perturbation parameter in [16], is also given explicitly.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In this section, we present the adaptive neural network fault-tolerant control using the backstepping technique for helicopter yaw control system. The recursive design process contains two steps in the system of Equation (5).The design procedure is as follows:…”
Section: Controller Design and Stability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, it is a challenging task to determine the control input. To overcome this design difficulty for a non-affine system, the traditional approaches contain an inverse control strategy [5] that requires more accurate mathematical models. T-S fuzzy control [6], mean value theorem [7][8][9], which has many online adjustment parameters, and Taylor series expansion [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since its estimates are conservative, it may waste power by using somewhat higher frequencies than needed. To improve efficiency, we use a simple PI controller [55] that observes the difference between the measured and predicted tail latencies over a rolling 1-second window and adjusts Rubik's internal latency target. Adjustments are minor, as the analytical model typically needs little correction.…”
Section: Rubik Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%