2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2017.01.001
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proposal for a national coverage determination for the treatment of varicose veins and venous disease due to disparate Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services local coverage determination policies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[8][9][10] Despite these facts, abundant controversy remains as those who present with AAGSV reflux as the initial presenting pattern represent the square peg that no longer fits under existing coverage policy restrictions. 11,12 Major insurance carriers including Aetna, Anthem, Cigna, Humana, and UnitedHealthcare as well as multiple smaller regional carriers continue to restrict treatment of the AAGSV despite evidence supporting its severity in patients with symptomatic venous incompetence (Table I). Population registries offer the ability to study a disease state over a wide spectrum of providers and geography.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8][9][10] Despite these facts, abundant controversy remains as those who present with AAGSV reflux as the initial presenting pattern represent the square peg that no longer fits under existing coverage policy restrictions. 11,12 Major insurance carriers including Aetna, Anthem, Cigna, Humana, and UnitedHealthcare as well as multiple smaller regional carriers continue to restrict treatment of the AAGSV despite evidence supporting its severity in patients with symptomatic venous incompetence (Table I). Population registries offer the ability to study a disease state over a wide spectrum of providers and geography.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%