2004
DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2004.34.11.686
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proposal of a Classification System for Patients With Neck Pain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
74
0
8

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
3
74
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Observational studies and practice guidelines suggest that traction may be most effective in the subgroup of patients with neck pain who exhibit signs of cervical radiculopathy. 6,8,9,16 Raney and colleagues 34 identified even more-specific criteria associated with clinical benefit from treatment that includes cervical traction. Five clinical factors were predictive of benefit: (1) peripheralization of symptoms with lower cervical mobility testing, (2) positive shoulder abduction sign, (3) positive manual distraction test, (4) positive upper-limb tension test, and (5) age of 55 years or older.…”
Section: T T Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observational studies and practice guidelines suggest that traction may be most effective in the subgroup of patients with neck pain who exhibit signs of cervical radiculopathy. 6,8,9,16 Raney and colleagues 34 identified even more-specific criteria associated with clinical benefit from treatment that includes cervical traction. Five clinical factors were predictive of benefit: (1) peripheralization of symptoms with lower cervical mobility testing, (2) positive shoulder abduction sign, (3) positive manual distraction test, (4) positive upper-limb tension test, and (5) age of 55 years or older.…”
Section: T T Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 Classification of patients with neck pain as a means of optimizing treatment prescription and estimating prognosis has been a developing theme in the spinal pain literature in recent years. 5,31,33 Identification of more homogeneous study populations enhances the potential to provide targeted interventions and to evaluate treatment responses more specifically. 5,29 The Quebec Task Force on Spinal Disorders recommended the development of a classification system for spinal pain disorders that was simple and had prognostic utility.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,31,33 Identification of more homogeneous study populations enhances the potential to provide targeted interventions and to evaluate treatment responses more specifically. 5,29 The Quebec Task Force on Spinal Disorders recommended the development of a classification system for spinal pain disorders that was simple and had prognostic utility. 30 However, determining a suitable method of classification of neck pain disorders and identification of responders and nonresponders to treatment remains an ongoing challenge.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preliminary work regarding disablement-based classification systems for lower back and neck pain show promise for structuring future outcomes studies of individuals with nonspecific diagnoses. 16,26 The high frequency of nonspecific referral diagnoses in patients with spine and upper extremity problems prioritize the development of spine and upper quarter classification schemes.…”
Section: Effect Of Patient Characteristics On Frequency Of Specific Dmentioning
confidence: 99%