2017
DOI: 10.17485/ijst/2017/v10i25/114443
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proposed Approach for Sarcasm Detection in Twitter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Authors of [53] used Textblob for pre-processing, polarity, the polarity confidence calculation, and they validated the obtained results by SVM and Naïve Bayes using Weka; they reported the highest accuracy of Naïve Bayes with a 65.2% rate, which was 5.1% more than the SVM accuracy rate. An unsupervised machine-learning algorithm was introduced [54] to rate the reviews as thumbs up and thumbs down; 410 reviews were gathered from Epinions and tested, the observed accuracy of the algorithm was 74%.…”
Section: Background Study/literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Authors of [53] used Textblob for pre-processing, polarity, the polarity confidence calculation, and they validated the obtained results by SVM and Naïve Bayes using Weka; they reported the highest accuracy of Naïve Bayes with a 65.2% rate, which was 5.1% more than the SVM accuracy rate. An unsupervised machine-learning algorithm was introduced [54] to rate the reviews as thumbs up and thumbs down; 410 reviews were gathered from Epinions and tested, the observed accuracy of the algorithm was 74%.…”
Section: Background Study/literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This work conducted experiment on online product reviews and measured the performance in terms of overall accuracy, average precision, average recall and average F-Measure. Shubhodip Saha et al [25] detected sarcasm by analysing the Twitter posts using Naïve Bayes and SVM classifiers and its accuracy was calculated using WEKA tool. For pre processing of data, TextBlob was used, which is one of the Natural Language Toolkit (NLT) packages.…”
Section: A Sentiment Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research focuses on finding sentiments from Twitter data. Most of the researchers dealt with various ML approaches of sentiment analysis [20][21][22][23][24][25], and just classified sentiments as positive and negative sentiments. Hence, this research work addresses the likes, dislikes and character of the persons in addition to regular sentiment analysis, which will be helpful to know the complete personality of a person.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the help of sarcasm detection techniques, companies can analyze customers’ feelings about their products. This provides crucial help for those companies to boost their product quality (Saha et al, 2017). In sentiment analysis, the sarcasm classification is an essential subtask (Cambria et al, 2015), especially in classifying tweets, for conveying implicit information within the message that a person expresses or shares with others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%