2016
DOI: 10.5194/amt-2016-121
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proposed standardized definitions for vertical resolution and uncertainty in the NDACC lidar ozone and temperature algorithms – Part 2: Ozone DIAL uncertainty budget

Abstract: Abstract. A standardized approach for the definition, propagation and reporting of uncertainty in the ozone differential absorption lidar data products contributing to the Network for the Detection for Atmospheric Composition Change (NDACC) database is proposed. One essential aspect of the proposed approach is the propagation in parallel of all independent uncertainty components through the data processing chain before they are combined together to form the ozone combined standard uncertainty. The independent… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Raws signals both analog and photon counting are background subtracted and range-squared before applying a single-pass Savitzky-Golay filter (Leblanc et al, 2016b, and references therein); the more points used in the filter, the lower the resolution. Analog and photon-count channels are merged together to provide a single optimized profile for range and signal-to-noise performance (Leblanc et al, 2016b;Zhang et al, 2014;Newsom et al, 2009). Ozone cross sections along with pressure and temperature information are used as part of the filter process to extract ozone mixing ratio as a function of altitude.…”
Section: The Langley Mobile Ozone Lidar (Lmol)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raws signals both analog and photon counting are background subtracted and range-squared before applying a single-pass Savitzky-Golay filter (Leblanc et al, 2016b, and references therein); the more points used in the filter, the lower the resolution. Analog and photon-count channels are merged together to provide a single optimized profile for range and signal-to-noise performance (Leblanc et al, 2016b;Zhang et al, 2014;Newsom et al, 2009). Ozone cross sections along with pressure and temperature information are used as part of the filter process to extract ozone mixing ratio as a function of altitude.…”
Section: The Langley Mobile Ozone Lidar (Lmol)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Table Mountain, where ozone profiles during daytime and nighttime are available, the vertical range is increased up to 25 km during the night. The overall precision reaches from 5 % in the free troposphere to up to 15 % above 20 km (Leblanc et al, 2016).…”
Section: Validation Data: Mls Ozonesondes and Lidarsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For all other times during the TROPOZ operation, the data have been averaged to 10 min, which is suitable under most clear sky conditions to retrieve ozone information within the entire troposphere. A brief description and community standardized definitions of the uncertainty budget of the lidar measurements presented in this paper can be found in Sullivan et al (2014), Leblanc et al (2016Leblanc et al ( , 2018. The maximum statistical uncertainties for the two GSFC lidars vary from night to night depending on atmospheric conditions and laser power fluctuations.…”
Section: Nasa Ozone Differential Absorption Lidar (Dial)mentioning
confidence: 99%