Handbook of Model Checking 2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-10575-8_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Propositional SAT Solving

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first class is the full algorithms that are guaranteed to end with a right choice as to whether the CNF is satisfied or unsatisfied. DPLL and Clause Learning (CDCL) Conflict-Driven algorithms fall into the full algorithm category [26], [51], [21], [52,53,54,55]. The second class is incomplete schemes that don't give the assurance that a good satisfactory assignment will either be reported in a preset time limit or declared unsatisfactory, but a solution can be found quicker than a complete algorithm.…”
Section: A Boolean Satisfiability Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first class is the full algorithms that are guaranteed to end with a right choice as to whether the CNF is satisfied or unsatisfied. DPLL and Clause Learning (CDCL) Conflict-Driven algorithms fall into the full algorithm category [26], [51], [21], [52,53,54,55]. The second class is incomplete schemes that don't give the assurance that a good satisfactory assignment will either be reported in a preset time limit or declared unsatisfactory, but a solution can be found quicker than a complete algorithm.…”
Section: A Boolean Satisfiability Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use common notation for propositional logic and many-sorted first-order logic as can be reviewed in [2,22]. In particular, we define a signature as Σ = Σ S , Σ P , Σ F , ∫ P , ∫ F where Σ S are the available sorts, Σ P are the predicate symbols, Σ F are the function symbols and ∫ P : Σ P → Σ S * (∫ F : Σ F → Σ S + ) defines the rank of a given predicate (function).…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, one of the major motivations in proof complexity has been its close connection to SAT solving [ 29 , 54 ]. SAT solvers have turned into ubiquitous tools for the solution of hard computational problems from almost all application domains [ 46 ], yet a theoretical understanding of their effectiveness is only initially developed. The main approach comes through proof complexity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%