2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-679x.2012.00441.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proprietary Costs and the Disclosure of Information About Customers

Abstract: In deciding how much information about their firms' customers to disclose, managers face a trade off between the benefits of reducing information asymmetry with capital market participants and the costs of aiding competitors by revealing proprietary information. This paper investigates the determinants of managers' choices to disclose information about their firms' customers using a comprehensive data set of customer-information disclosures over the period . We find robust evidence in support of the hypothesis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
152
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 398 publications
(170 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
16
152
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, this prediction is derived analytically byDarrough (1993) andVerrecchia (1983Verrecchia ( , 1990, and supported empirically byCampbell (1979) andEllis, Fee, and Thomas (2012), among others.…”
mentioning
confidence: 64%
“…For example, this prediction is derived analytically byDarrough (1993) andVerrecchia (1983Verrecchia ( , 1990, and supported empirically byCampbell (1979) andEllis, Fee, and Thomas (2012), among others.…”
mentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Botosan and Stanford (2005) found that firms with higher proprietary costs are less likely to report detailed segment information voluntarily. Later, Verechia and Weber (2006) and Ellis et al (2012) observed this relationship for filings detailing material contracts and for customer disclosure, respectively.…”
Section: Board Independence and Shareholders' Interest: Research Hypomentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Higher values of abnormal profit persistence imply a lower level of competition because if the correlation is high, it implies that abnormal profits tend to be sticky over time and converge to normal rates of return more slowly. In contrast, a low correlation implies that abnormal profits quickly converge to 0 for firms in an industry and that the industry is more competitive (Ellis et al, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Given the complex nature of the theory and measurement of industry concentration, we draw no inference from this result. 26 Consistent with Ellis, Fee, and Thomas [2012], firms disclose more before SEO announcements. However, the coefficient on M&A announcement is positive and somewhat unexpected.…”
Section: T a B L E 2 Idd And Nondisclosure Of Customer Informationmentioning
confidence: 86%