2005
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.2663-05.2005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proprioceptor Regulation of Motor Circuit Activity by Presynaptic Inhibition of a Modulatory Projection Neuron

Abstract: Phasically active sensory systems commonly influence rhythmic motor activity via synaptic actions on the relevant circuit and/or motor neurons. Using the crab stomatogastric nervous system (STNS), we identified a distinct synaptic action by which an identified proprioceptor, the gastropyloricmusclestretchreceptor(GPR)neuron,regulatesthegastricmill(chewing)motorrhythm.Previousworkshowedthatrhythmically stimulating GPR in a gastric mill-like pattern, in the isolated STNS, elicits the gastric mill rhythm via its … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
118
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(88 reference statements)
7
118
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, when the pyloric rhythm was suppressed the Int1 inhibition of LG was constant, as well as stronger than PK excitation, which maintained LG at a hyperpolarized potential and prevented postinhibitory rebound bursts. In contrast, the continual buildup of MCN1 excitation enables LG to escape from Int1-mediated inhibition and fire an impulse burst when AB activity is suppressed (Bartos et al, 1999;Beenhakker et al, 2005). However, during the MCN1 rhythm with an ongoing pyloric rhythm, each LG burst initiates during an episode of AB inhibition of Int1, suggesting that escape from inhibition and postinhibitory rebound both contribute to LG burst onset during this rhythm (Bartos et al, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, when the pyloric rhythm was suppressed the Int1 inhibition of LG was constant, as well as stronger than PK excitation, which maintained LG at a hyperpolarized potential and prevented postinhibitory rebound bursts. In contrast, the continual buildup of MCN1 excitation enables LG to escape from Int1-mediated inhibition and fire an impulse burst when AB activity is suppressed (Bartos et al, 1999;Beenhakker et al, 2005). However, during the MCN1 rhythm with an ongoing pyloric rhythm, each LG burst initiates during an episode of AB inhibition of Int1, suggesting that escape from inhibition and postinhibitory rebound both contribute to LG burst onset during this rhythm (Bartos et al, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These different rhythms result mainly from differences in the MCN1 activity pattern and/or firing rate, and the level of participation of a second projection neuron, commissural projection neuron 2. In all of these rhythms, the core CPG includes the reciprocally inhibitory STG neurons LG and Int1 plus the STG terminals of MCN1 Bartos et al, 1999;Wood et al, 2004;Beenhakker et al, 2005). MCN1 is considered to be a gastric mill CPG neuron as well as a rhythm activator because it must release its cotransmitter complement in a gastric mill rhythm-timed pattern to drive this rhythm .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…D, Stimulating GPR at the behaviorally appropriate time slows the VCN-elicited gastric mill rhythm by prolonging the retractor phase. Rhythmic stimulation of GPR (bars, 5 Hz) during the retractor phase (DG neuron active) of a VCN-triggered gastric mill rhythm caused a progressively increasing prolongation of the retractor phase (Beenhakker et al, 2005).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite activating the gastric mill rhythm by targeting the same projection neurons, the GPR-elicited rhythm is slower and shorter-lasting than the one triggered by VCN stimulation . Stimulating GPR during the VCNtriggered gastric mill rhythm slows this rhythm as well by selectively prolonging the gastric mill retractor phase, at least partly via GPR inhibition of the STG terminals of MCN1 (MCN1 STG ) (Beenhakker et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%