2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2020.115257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective clinical validation of 3D printed nasopharyngeal swabs for diagnosis of COVID-19

Abstract: Highlights Diagnosis of COVID-19 using 3D printed swabs needs prospective validation Two 3D printed designs demonstrate high concordance with traditional flocked swabs 3D printed swabs may be appropriate alternatives for diagnosing COVID-19

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3D printing proved to be such a manufacturing technique with numerous cases of its utilization for the fabrication of PPEs reported [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. This included healthcare institutions already owning 3D printers used on other occasions, companies whose production lines were put on halt due to the pandemic outbreak, local maker communities and SMEs owning 3D printing equipment, university labs where such equipment is used for research and educational purposes, as well as dedicated makerspaces and fab labs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3D printing proved to be such a manufacturing technique with numerous cases of its utilization for the fabrication of PPEs reported [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. This included healthcare institutions already owning 3D printers used on other occasions, companies whose production lines were put on halt due to the pandemic outbreak, local maker communities and SMEs owning 3D printing equipment, university labs where such equipment is used for research and educational purposes, as well as dedicated makerspaces and fab labs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Companies whose production lines were put on halt due to the pandemic outbreak also used their 3D printers toward this direction. Enterprises, such as SpaceX, Tesla, AirCo, INKSmith, Markforged, Formlabs, Voodoo Manufacturing, and Resonance, 3M, Johnson Safety Products, Alpha ProTech, DuPont, MSA Safety, Honeywell, Ansell, etc., manufactured PPEs and other protective equipment [22][23][24]. More specifically, thousands of 3D antibacterial biocellulose swabs lattice structure for COVID-19 testing as well as antibacterial bio-cellulose masks and respirator valves have been produced in this way [13].…”
Section: D Printing Technology On Ppe Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collaboration of big universities and key 3D printer making companies allowed for prototyping and quality testing new devices shared online for public use. The 3D printed nasal swabs were one of the main outcomes of such collaborations during the early stages of this pandemic [ 67 , 68 ]. Despite the rapidness and accessibility of 3D printing, one of the main challenges with the mentioned approach is the lack of safety regulation and meeting the standards of proposed devices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cox and Koepsell [52] created a PETG nasopharyngeal swab. Arnold et al [53] developed a swab with an open lattice design to be produced by DLP process. Resolution Medical and Origin Laboratories also have different types of 3D-printed swab models [54].…”
Section: D Printing In the Diagnosis Of Covid-19mentioning
confidence: 99%