Background: Most lung cancer patients present with lesions in both lung fields and lymphadenopathy. Thus, transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC) and endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) are commonly performed for diagnosing lung cancer. However, the adequacy of these samples for next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the adequacy between TBLC and EBUS-TBNA samples for NGS analysis. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients whose lung samples were collected via TBLC or EBUS-TBNA and analyzed using NGS. Out of 46 genes, the number of genes in TBNA and TBLC samples that could not be assessed via NGS analysis was mainly evaluated. Results: A total of 37 patients were included and classified into two groups (TBLC group, n = 18 and TBNA group, n = 19). The mean number of genes that could not be evaluated via NGS analysis was significantly lower in the TBLC group than in the TBNA group (0.9 vs. 10.3, P = 0.024). The median total area of tumor cells in TBLC samples was significantly greater than that in TBNA samples (6.3 [1.6-4.2] vs. 2.6 [0.2-17.3] mm 2 , P < 0.01). In the TBNA group, there were two fully inadequate samples for NGS analysis with a high degree of cell crush or low tumor content, while there was no fully inadequate sample in the TBLC group. Conclusions: TBLC is more effective in obtaining adequate samples for NGS analysis than EBUS-TBNA. TBLC should be performed to obtain adequate samples for NGS analysis in lung cancer patients with target lesions in lung fields, even if they have lymphadenopathy.