1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7292(98)00116-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective randomized comparison between an open and closed vaginal cuff in abdominal hysterectomy

Abstract: Both techniques of hysterectomy produced a similar postoperative course despite the fact that the closed vaginal cuff technique resulted in a higher incidence of pelvic fluid collections. Therefore considering a shorter operation time for the closed vaginal cuff hysterectomy, this technique seems slightly preferable.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A brief review in the last six years in attention to surgical management of vaginal vault after total abdominal hysterectomy showed only reports in human being [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] . All of them stand up the relations of the surgical techniques of vault closure to post operative complains.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A brief review in the last six years in attention to surgical management of vaginal vault after total abdominal hysterectomy showed only reports in human being [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] . All of them stand up the relations of the surgical techniques of vault closure to post operative complains.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total abdominal hysterectomy with vaginal vault closure is more frequently reported than the open vault technique 15,17 , probably due to longer operation time of open procedure. This longer operation time for the open vault technique stems from the need for both peritoneal cover and haemostatic sutures around the vaginal cuff.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We identified four RCTs (n0612) published between 1992 and1998 [23][24][25][26]. Though they differed in how they closed the cuff and the primary outcomes, two of three RCTs noted a significant decrease in the operative time when the cuff was closed, possibly due to the hemostasis at the vaginal cuff obtained during closure with staples or sutures [23,26]. Using staples to close the cuff [23], there was significant improvement in intraoperative hemostasis and granulation at 6 weeks postoperative.…”
Section: Moderatementioning
confidence: 99%