2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective slice-by-slice motion correction reduces false positive activations in fMRI with task-correlated motion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rotenberg et al (2013) and Schulz et al (2014) both demonstrated improvements in data quality when subject motion, both deliberate and task‐correlated, was present. Zaitsev et al (2016) conducted an experiment with a similar paradigm but did not find any significant differences, likely due to the smaller sample size, choice of robust activation pattern and poor marker adhesion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Rotenberg et al (2013) and Schulz et al (2014) both demonstrated improvements in data quality when subject motion, both deliberate and task‐correlated, was present. Zaitsev et al (2016) conducted an experiment with a similar paradigm but did not find any significant differences, likely due to the smaller sample size, choice of robust activation pattern and poor marker adhesion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most previous studies that investigated the effectiveness of PMC used deliberate subject motion (Ooi, Krueger, Muraskin, Thomas, & Brown, 2011; Schulz et al, 2014; Todd et al, 2015), which may not be representative of actual participant behavior in the scanner. For instance, deliberate motion is likely to result in larger head displacements than what would be observed in a typical participant instructed to remain still, and thus result in an overestimation of the benefit of PMC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The topic of prospective motion correction has gained popularity in the last few years resulting in numerous new applications including fMRI (101, 102), DWI (103, 104), and spectroscopy (105-107). Although it is an extremely promising approach for neuroimaging, it does have some limitations, including practical considerations (e.g., marker fixation for external tracking systems) and uncorrectable effects (e.g., motion-related B0 distortions (108)).…”
Section: Artefact Mitigation Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fixation device in combination with the sphinx position reduces normal motion artifacts and artifacts from breathing, but not those from jaw motion. The latter artifacts can be reduced by intensive conditioning of the monkey and a jaw motion sensor in combination with image motion correction technics, as shown by Keliris et al 2007 [14,34,35]. This issue could be more relevant when using the horizontal MRI system with a sphinx position in comparison to vertical MRI systems with the monkey in a more natural sitting position.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%