2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10151-021-02445-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective study of urinary function and analysis of risk factors after rectal cancer surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies corroborate the results in the present study to some degree. In contradiction to our findings, Torrijo et al [ 22 ], with shorter follow-up time than ours (12 months), reported AL as a risk factor for urinary dysfunction measured by IPSS [ 26 ]. Our results are also in contrast with Kverneng et al reporting that AL was associated with a decreased risk for urinary incontinence [ 15 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…These studies corroborate the results in the present study to some degree. In contradiction to our findings, Torrijo et al [ 22 ], with shorter follow-up time than ours (12 months), reported AL as a risk factor for urinary dysfunction measured by IPSS [ 26 ]. Our results are also in contrast with Kverneng et al reporting that AL was associated with a decreased risk for urinary incontinence [ 15 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Postoperative urinary function after rectal cancer surgery may be impacted by several factors. [31][32][33] According to Manabe et al, 23 bilateral IVA resection can significantly increase the incidence of postoperative urinary dysfunction because of decreased blood flow to the bladder and the subsequent lower urinary tract symptoms; however, the influence of unilateral IVA resection was similar to that of no IVA resection. In our study, although the bilateral LLND accounted for a small proportion, patients in the NIR group tended to have better postoperative urinary function than those in the non-NIR group, which may be attributed to the higher IVA preservation rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%