1977
DOI: 10.1148/123.2.497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospects for Hyperthermia in Human Cancer Therapy

Abstract: Laboratory data from studies of hyperthermia as a potential antitumor agent indicate that: (a) tumor cells may be more sensitive to heat than normal tissue; (b) hyperthermia enhances response to irradiation and can increase the therapeutic ratio; (c) cells are most sensitive to hyperthermia during the S-phase, when they are resistant to ionizing radiations; (d) the oxygen effect is absent for hyperthermic cell killing, and radiation effects are less oxygen-dependent when potentiated by heat treatment; and (e) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One must be careful in this hyperthermia approach since tumor cells can be more sensitive to heat than normal tissue [29], [30] and from our experience it is even possible to cure some small tumors with NIR alone (Figure 9A). The addition of a small amount of absorbing nanoparticles may tip the balance from not being eradicated to full ablation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One must be careful in this hyperthermia approach since tumor cells can be more sensitive to heat than normal tissue [29], [30] and from our experience it is even possible to cure some small tumors with NIR alone (Figure 9A). The addition of a small amount of absorbing nanoparticles may tip the balance from not being eradicated to full ablation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Single heating of most cell lines, tumours and normal tissues yields a biphasic Arrhenius plot with an activation energy of approximately 500-800 and 1200-1700 kJ/mol above and below an inflection point at 42.5-43"C, respectively (Conner et al 1977, Dewey et al 1977, Bauer and Henle 1979, Field and Morris 1983, Henle 1983. For several years the Arrhenius plot for SDH has been regarded as being monophasic extending the activation energy from above 42 -5-43°C to the temperature range below the inflection point (Henle 1980, Field and Morris 1984, Lindegaard and Overgaard 1987.…”
Section: Arrhenius Analysis Of the Sdh Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is demonstrated by a reduction in D 0 and D q , two parameters that denote the slope and initial shoulder of the clonogenic cell survival curve that represents cell sensitivity to IR (10). As a result of clinical studies over the last 20 years, it appears that there is a significant advantage in the use of heat combined with IR or cytotoxic drugs to enhance tumor cell killing (11). As such, hyperthermic radiosensitization remains a powerful model system to investigate the biochemical and molecular mechanism(s) of radiosensitization.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%