2008
DOI: 10.3129/i07-182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prostaglandin analogues for ophthalmic use: a cost-effectiveness analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, a newer study done in Canada suggested that for patients in whom timolol is not contraindicated, it would be preferable, from a cost-effectiveness standpoint, to initiate treatment with timolol and reserve the prostaglandin analogues as an alternative treatment or as add-on therapy for patients not achieving a clinical response with timolol. The reasons being, although latanoprost is arguably more effective in its IOP-lowering effects than dorzolamide, brimonidine, or timolol, it is also more expensive (Lachaine et al 2008). However, these studies are at best conflicting in their findings.…”
Section: Socioeconomic Burdenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, a newer study done in Canada suggested that for patients in whom timolol is not contraindicated, it would be preferable, from a cost-effectiveness standpoint, to initiate treatment with timolol and reserve the prostaglandin analogues as an alternative treatment or as add-on therapy for patients not achieving a clinical response with timolol. The reasons being, although latanoprost is arguably more effective in its IOP-lowering effects than dorzolamide, brimonidine, or timolol, it is also more expensive (Lachaine et al 2008). However, these studies are at best conflicting in their findings.…”
Section: Socioeconomic Burdenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The topical medication cost was calculated following methods used in previously published reports. [15][16][17][18] The cost of each bottle of medication was determined using the amounts reimbursed by the Ontario Drug Benefit Formulary. 19 All values are reported as Canadian dollars.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lachaine et al (2008) used IOP reduction in millimeters of mercury (compared with baseline and the incidence of adverse events) as the effectiveness data of the most used glaucoma medications, and found that dorzolamide, compared with latanoprost, is not a cost-effective strategy. Latanoprost, compared with brimonidine, has provided a higher IOP reduction with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, but the additional IOP reduction with latanoprost was obtained at a higher cost than the average cost per millimeter of mercury reduction obtained with brimonidine.…”
Section: Latanoprost Ophthalmic Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Latanoprost, compared with brimonidine, has provided a higher IOP reduction with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, but the additional IOP reduction with latanoprost was obtained at a higher cost than the average cost per millimeter of mercury reduction obtained with brimonidine. Compared with timolol, latanoprost had a positive incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (Lachaine et al 2008). Payet et al (2008) assessed the cost-effectiveness of latanoprost versus travoprost as single agents for the treatment of glaucoma in France and pointed out that travoprost demonstrated a longer effectiveness profi le than latanoprost, although travoprost was more expensive than latanoprost (additional 5-year costs for travoprost were €51).…”
Section: Latanoprost Ophthalmic Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%