1992
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(92)91344-a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prostaglandin E2 for induction of labor in patients with premature rupture of membranes at term

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
4

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
19
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…All had uneventful neonatal hospital stays. 2.8% (term babies), 4.5% Ray and Garite, 1-3.4% cases in our studies, 2.79% cases in Chua et al [8][9][10][11] In a study conducted by Ezechi OC for induction of labour in PROM patients with PG E1 (misoprostol) LSCS rate was 18.6%, Hyper stimulation rate was 3% Rate of fetal distress was 10.2% and birth asphyxia rate was 3% which is more in comparison to our study. 12 In a study conducted by Bangal VB et al vaginal delivery rate was 88%, LSCS rate was 12%, fetal distress was seen in 8% of the patients and hyper bilirubinemia in 20% of the patients, the rate of normal delivery is less compared to our study and fetal distress is more compared to our study.…”
Section: 8-11supporting
confidence: 44%
“…All had uneventful neonatal hospital stays. 2.8% (term babies), 4.5% Ray and Garite, 1-3.4% cases in our studies, 2.79% cases in Chua et al [8][9][10][11] In a study conducted by Ezechi OC for induction of labour in PROM patients with PG E1 (misoprostol) LSCS rate was 18.6%, Hyper stimulation rate was 3% Rate of fetal distress was 10.2% and birth asphyxia rate was 3% which is more in comparison to our study. 12 In a study conducted by Bangal VB et al vaginal delivery rate was 88%, LSCS rate was 12%, fetal distress was seen in 8% of the patients and hyper bilirubinemia in 20% of the patients, the rate of normal delivery is less compared to our study and fetal distress is more compared to our study.…”
Section: 8-11supporting
confidence: 44%
“…However, they have not mentioned any specific contraindication of using PGE 2 in PPROM patients. In fact, the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and Ray and Garite [10] refer to the safety and effectiveness of PGE 2 in the context of PROM, and a 2004 study of 262 patients with both term and preterm PROM found that there were no apparent maternal or fetal complications in women who were administered PGE 2 [11]. In our study, PPROM showed a significantly higher success rate of induction than did the other groups, with no differences in terms of intrapartum complications such as tachysystole or non-reassuring fetal heart rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only 47 (6%) of the nulliparous women in the study population had a Bishop score of 1 or 2. In women with a very low Bishop score, the administration of prostaglandins may be a useful alternative to ripen the cervix 16 . However, since these patients are rare, their existence does not indicate that a routine digital examination should be performed at admission.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%