2009
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prostate cancer as a first and second cancer: effect of family history

Abstract: Background:Diagnosis with prostate cancer has been reported to increase the risk of subsequent tumours. However, specific data on individuals with a parental history are not available so far.Methods:On the basis of the nationwide Swedish Family-Cancer Database including 18,207 primary invasive prostate cancers, standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) were used to estimate the relative risks of subsequent tumours after prostate cancer in the general population and among individuals with a parental history of cance… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a large body of literature on second primary cancers which generally shows that the patients are at an increased risk of any cancer, including discordant cancer . The risks are known to interact with the family history for discordant cancer, which would be in line with the current findings . Although multiple primary cancers can have many etiologies the presentation of discordant cancers may in part be an expression of an overall cancer risk at the individual level, which may be enforced by a family history of cancer.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…There is a large body of literature on second primary cancers which generally shows that the patients are at an increased risk of any cancer, including discordant cancer . The risks are known to interact with the family history for discordant cancer, which would be in line with the current findings . Although multiple primary cancers can have many etiologies the presentation of discordant cancers may in part be an expression of an overall cancer risk at the individual level, which may be enforced by a family history of cancer.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The cumulative incidence of second cancer was estimated with death treated as a competing risk. 24 Interaction contrast ratios (ICRs) and multiplicative interaction indexes (MIIs) were used to investigate the possible interaction between HL treatment and family history of cancer: 25 ICR = SIR cancerxfh − SIR cancer − SIR fh + 1 and MII = SIR cancerxfh /(SIR cancer × SIR fh ), where SIR cancer is the relative risk (RR) of cancer in HL survivors, SIR fh is the RR associated with having an affected FDR, and SIR cancerxfh is the RR of cancer in HL survivors having an affected FDR. MII > 1 signifies greater than multiplicative interaction, and ICR > 0 signifies a positive interaction or more than additivity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When looking at specific cancer types, Davies et al reported that survivors of prostate cancer had a 40% lower risk of developing a SPC compared to the general male US population; the risk was lower for leukemias and cancers of the oral cavity, stomach, colon, liver, lung, and pancreas [108]. However, they observed a higher risk of developing bladder [109,110], renal, and endocrine cancers [111,112]; this seems to be influenced by pelvic radiation therapy for prostate cancer [108]. Moreover, diagnostic bias is thought to play a role due to anatomy.…”
Section: Prostate Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%