Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (Cat. No.00CH37
DOI: 10.1109/iembs.2000.901572
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prostate segmentation from 2D ultrasound images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
37
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
5
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average DSC value of our method with 0.95±0.01 is comparable to mean DSC values achieved by Betrouni et al 7 and Ladak et al 17 and inferior to the area overlap measure of Abolmaesumi et al 16 of 98%. However, it is to be noted that we have used more images (24 images) compared to 6 images of Abolmaesumi et al Our MAD value of 1.50±0.41 mm is comparable to Gong et al…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The average DSC value of our method with 0.95±0.01 is comparable to mean DSC values achieved by Betrouni et al 7 and Ladak et al 17 and inferior to the area overlap measure of Abolmaesumi et al 16 of 98%. However, it is to be noted that we have used more images (24 images) compared to 6 images of Abolmaesumi et al Our MAD value of 1.50±0.41 mm is comparable to Gong et al…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Analyzing the results, we observe that our mean DSC value is better than the area overlap accuracy values of Betrouni et al [3] and Ladak et al [14] and very similar to the area overlap error of Shen et al [18]. However, it is to be noted that we have used more images compared to Shen et al Our MAD value also shows improvement when compared to [3], [18], [14], [6] and [19]. From these observations we may infer our method performs well in overlap and contour accuracy measures when assessed qualitatively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…For example Badiei et al [2] used a deformable model of warping ellipse and Ladak et al [14] used discrete dynamic contour to achieve semi-automatic prostate segmentation. However, prostate segmentation during TRUS guided biopsy procedures should necessarily be automatic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods require expert intervention during initialization of the model or during refinement of the segmented contour. Often deformable models and statistical shape models are used to achieve segmentation in semi automatic methods like [3], [4]. However, it is necessary to use an automatic prostate segmentation method for TRUS guided procedures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%