Prostatitis crónica bacteriana. Estudio clínico y microbiológico de 332 casos

Heras-Cañas, Víctor; Gutiérrez-Soto, Blanca; Serrano-García, María Luisa; Vázquez-Alonso, Fernando; Navarro-Marí, José María; Gutiérrez‐Fernández, José

doi:10.1016/j.medcli.2016.05.018

Cited by 18 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In another study, based on 332 patients diagnosed with CBP, the two most identified agents in the EPS culture of 23 (44.3%) cases were Enterococcus faecalis and E. coli which was similar to our study (16). Despite that, the proportional excess of bacteria, which were reproduced in the cell culture, and the determination of a high ratio of E. faecalis are becoming dissimilar.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 87%

“…The symptom scores of all the patients were calculated out of a total of 43 points, considering the NIH-CPSI according to the subgroups of pain (0-21 points), quality of life (0-12 points), and urinary symptoms (0-10 points). Patients were separated into three groups according to their symptom scores on the NIH-CPSI index as severe (>29), moderate (16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29), and mild dysfunction (0-15).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Chronic Bacterial Prostatitis in a Turkish Population: The Microbiological Etiology and Distribution

Arda¹,

Fakultesi²,

Çakıroğlu³

et al. 2018

JAREM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To investigate the category 2 frequency and microorganism distribution of patients diagnosed with chronic prostatitis in a Turkish population.Methods: Data of 3200 patients diagnosed with chronic prostatitis in the urology outpatient clinic between 2009 and 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. The symptom scores were calculated considering the National Institutes of Health-Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) according to pain (0-21 points), quality of life (0-12 points), and urinary (0-10 points) subdomains to a total score of 0-43 points. All patients were checked for symptoms, urinalysis, expressed prostatic secretion (EPS), or urine after prostatic massage (VB3) culture and PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) of EPS or VB3 for Chlamydia trachomatis, Ureaplasma urealyticum, Mycoplasma hominis, Mycoplasma genitalium, and Trichomonas vaginalis.Results: The mean age of the patients was calculated as 37.7±7.4 (range 22-65) years. The average of total NIH-CPSI score was determined as 9.08 (range 1-40). In 223 of 3200 patients, positive culture and/or PCR results were observed. The results were as follows: E. coli 27 (12.1%),

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 87%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Chronic Bacterial Prostatitis in a Turkish Population: The Microbiological Etiology and Distribution

Arda¹,

Fakultesi²,

Çakıroğlu³

et al. 2018

JAREM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Para el diagnóstico, Cai T et al [ 10 ], Skerk V et al [ 9 ] y Stamatiou K et al [ 11 ] utilizaron el método de Meares-Stamey clásico [ 12 ]. Seo Y et al [ 8 ], Heras-Cañas V et al [ 13 ] y Heras-Cañas V et al [ 14 ] utilizaron una modificación del método clásico, que tiene una concordancia similar al método tradicional [ 15 ]. Mazzoli S [ 16 ] utiliza una nueva modificación de la prueba de Meares-Stamey, introducida por su grupo de trabajo, en la que incluyen un cultivo de semen adicional, complementando al resto de muestras del método clásico.…”

Section: Resultsunclassified

Microbial etiology of bacterial chronic prostatitis: systematic review

et al. 2023

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives. The importance of Gram-positive microorganisms and atypical bacteria in chronic bacterial prostatitis (CBP) has recently been described. For this reason, this study analyzes the etiology of CBP, as well as the evolution of antibiotic resistance through a systematic review. Material and methods. A systematic review of studies obtained through the MEDLINE (PubMed) database, related to the etiology and antibiotic resistance profile of CBP, published up July 1, 2021. Results. The most frequent isolated microorganisms that we have found in publications are Enterococcus faecalis (46.90%), Staphylococcus spp. (22.30%), Escherichia coli (15.09%) and atypical bacteria (6.04%). Conclusions. CBP is undergoing and unprecedented change of paradigm. Gram-positive bacteria and atypical bacteria are the main pathogens involved in the aetiology of this entity. This forces us to rethink the therapeutic strategy used, since it is necessary to use antibiotics that assume the etiological change and the profile of antibiotic resistance described.

show abstract

“…The existence of increased oxidative stress and damage may be closely associated with the long course of CBP (Lou et al, 2006). In the past, E. coli was considered the main cause of CBP, but recent studies show that gram-positive bacteria, especially Enterococcus faecalis, have replaced E. coli and have been discovered as the causal agents (Bundrick et al, 2003;Cai et al, 2011;Heras-Canas et al, 2016). Furthermore, the pathogen that causes recurrent episodes of UTI is the same microbe.…”

Section: Pathogenesis and Pathogenic Microorganismsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Pharmacological Interventions for Bacterial Prostatitis

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Prostatitis is a common urinary tract condition but bring innumerable trouble to clinicians in treatment, as well as great financial burden to patients and the society. Bacterial prostatitis (acute bacterial prostatitis plus chronic bacterial prostatitis) accounting for approximately 20% among all prostatitis have made the urological clinics complain about the genital and urinary systems all over the world. The international challenges of antibacterial treatment (emergence of multidrug-resistant bacteria, extended-spectrum beta-lactamaseproducing bacteria, bacterial biofilms production and the shift in bacterial etiology) and the transformation of therapeutic strategy for classic therapy have attracted worldwide attention. To the best of our knowledge currently, there is not a single comprehensive review, which can completely elaborate these important topics and the corresponding treatment strategy in an effective way. This review summarizes the general treatment choices for bacterial prostatitis also provides the alternative pharmacological therapies for those patients resistant or intolerant to general treatment.

show abstract

Prostatitis crónica bacteriana. Estudio clínico y microbiológico de 332 casos

Cited by 18 publications

References 14 publications

Chronic Bacterial Prostatitis in a Turkish Population: The Microbiological Etiology and Distribution

Chronic Bacterial Prostatitis in a Turkish Population: The Microbiological Etiology and Distribution

Microbial etiology of bacterial chronic prostatitis: systematic review

Pharmacological Interventions for Bacterial Prostatitis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About