Prostatome: A combined anatomical and disease based MRI atlas of the prostate

Abstract

Purpose:In this work, the authors introduce a novel framework, the anatomically constrained registration (AnCoR) scheme and apply it to create a fused anatomic-disease atlas of the prostate which the authors refer to as the prostatome. The prostatome combines a MRI based anatomic and a histology based disease atlas. Statistical imaging atlases allow for the integration of information across multiple scales and imaging modalities into a single canonical representation, in turn enabling a fused anatomical-disease representation which may facilitate the characterization of disease appearance relative to anatomic structures. While statistical atlases have been extensively developed and studied for the brain, approaches that have attempted to combine pathology and imaging data for study of prostate pathology are not extant. This works seeks to address this gap. Methods: The AnCoR framework optimizes a scoring function composed of two surface (prostate and central gland) misalignment measures and one intensity-based similarity term. This ensures the correct mapping of anatomic regions into the atlas, even when regional MRI intensities are inconsistent or highly variable between subjects. The framework allows for creation of an anatomic imaging and a disease atlas, while enabling their fusion into the anatomic imaging-disease atlas. The atlas presented here was constructed using 83 subjects with biopsy confirmed cancer who had pre-operative MRI (collected at two institutions) followed by radical prostatectomy. The imaging atlas results from mapping the in vivo MRI into the canonical space, while the anatomic regions serve as domain constraints. Elastic co-registration MRI and corresponding ex vivo histology provides "ground truth" mapping of cancer extent on in vivo imaging for 23 subjects. Results: AnCoR was evaluated relative to alternative construction strategies that use either MRI intensities or the prostate surface alone for registration. The AnCoR framework yielded a central gland Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 90%, and prostate DSC of 88%, while the misalignment of the urethra and verumontanum was found to be 3.45 mm, and 4.73 mm, respectively, which were measured to be significantly smaller compared to the alternative strategies. As might have been anticipated from our limited cohort of biopsy confirmed cancers, the disease atlas showed that most of the tumor extent was limited to the peripheral zone. Moreover, central gland tumors were typically larger in size, possibly because they are only discernible at a much later stage. Conclusions:The authors presented the AnCoR framework to explicitly model anatomic constraints for the construction of a fused anatomic imaging-disease atlas. The framework was applied to constructing a preliminary version of an anatomic-disease atlas of the prostate, the prostatome. The prostatome could facilitate the quantitative characterization of gland morphology and imaging features of prostate cancer. These techniques, may be applied on a large sample size data set to create...

Quantifying Post- Laser Ablation Prostate Therapy Changes on MRI via a Domain-Specific Biomechanical Model: Preliminary Findings

“…prostatic hypertrophy), in future studies this confounding factor will have to be controlled for to assess changes solely due to the treatment modality. One way of doing this is via an atlas based approach, such as was presented in [ 25 ], where all the prostates within a population were mapped into a single canonical representation which allows for size normalization, so that additional changes can then be attributed primarily to the treatment.…”

Computational imaging reveals shape differences between normal and malignant prostates on MRI

“…For instance, the hippocampus shape has been shown to be correlated with Alzeimer’s disease progression and was suggested as a potential quantitative imaging biomarker to predict dementia progression 10 . Moreover, population analysis via statistical atlases are of particular utility as they combine information from multiple subjects into one unified representation 13 14 15 , thus facilitating quantitative comparisons across different populations. Various atlas approaches have been utilized to study the brain (e.g.…”

“…To characterize anatomic shape differences, we applied the anatomically constrained registration previously described by us in ref. 15 and created statistical shape atlases of the prostate and CG. The anatomically constrained registration was chosen for atlas construction, since it explicitly ensures accurate alignment of the prostate and CG between multiple subjects.…”

Quantitative identification of magnetic resonance imaging features of prostate cancer response following laser ablation and radical prostatectomy

“…For the histopathology to MRI registration, it is difficult to assess the exact accuracy of the method in this limited dataset, but previous reports in the literature using a similar methodology have reported errors of around 1.5 mm. 10,23,24 Even if registration errors were two times larger, the registration error is still relatively small compared to the lesion sizes (around 10 mm). As such, we do not expect the histopathology to MRI registration to have a big impact on the obtained results, although a better registration methodology could allow for improved lesion characterization and might be mandatory in cases with small lesions.…”