2014
DOI: 10.1177/089875641403100208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prosthetic Appliance for Oronasal Communication Obturation in a Dog

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is not always possible to trace the primary cause making a histological examination crucial to rule out pathologic conditions such as immune-mediated disease or neoplasia in which the surgical treatment should be carefully considered or would even be contraindicated in selected cases. 4143…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, it is not always possible to trace the primary cause making a histological examination crucial to rule out pathologic conditions such as immune-mediated disease or neoplasia in which the surgical treatment should be carefully considered or would even be contraindicated in selected cases. 4143…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is not always possible to trace the primary cause making a histological examination crucial to rule out pathologic conditions such as immune-mediated disease or neoplasia in which the surgical treatment should be carefully considered or would even be contraindicated in selected cases. [41][42][43] This article describes two dogs with chronic acquired palatal defects secondary to foreign bodies trapped between the right and left maxillary teeth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In both congenital and acquired defects, there is typically little surrounding tissue available for reconstruction, poor or damaged vascularity, relatively immobile tissues, localized infection of the tissues due to the chronic communication of the oral and nasal cavities, and constant mechanical stresses on the repair from respiration, mastication, and deglutition 2–4 . These hurdles have prompted the development of numerous techniques for repair of palatal defects, including: direct appositional closure, 5 single‐layer vestibular flaps, 1,5–11 mucoperiosteal rotation or transposition flaps, 1,5,6,9,11 double‐layer flaps, 1,5–8,11,12 overlapping flap technique, 5,11,13 bilateral vestibular mucosal overlapping flaps, 6,11,14 medially repositioned double flap (von Langenbeck technique), 1,5,9,11,13 split palatal U‐flap, 1,6,11,15 palatal island flaps, 16,17 myoperitoneal microvascular free flaps, 18 auricular cartilage grafts, 2,3,19 prosthetic obturators 20,21 and tongue flaps 22 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(von Langenbeck technique), 1,5,9,11,13 split palatal U-flap, 1,6,11,15 palatal island flaps, 16,17 myoperitoneal microvascular free flaps, 18 auricular cartilage grafts, 2,3,19 prosthetic obturators 20,21 and tongue flaps. 22 In addition, axial pattern flaps incorporating branches of the facial artery have been used successfully in humans, dogs, and cats for reconstruction of various defects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%