2010
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.01765-09
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protease Cleavage Sites in HIV-1 gp120 Recognized by Antigen Processing Enzymes Are Conserved and Located at Receptor Binding Sites

Abstract: The identification of vaccine immunogens able to elicit broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs) is a major goal in HIV vaccine research. Although it has been possible to produce recombinant envelope glycoproteins able to adsorb bNAbs from HIV-positive sera, immunization with these proteins has failed to elicit antibody responses effective against clinical isolates of HIV-1. Thus, the epitopes recognized by bNAbs are present on recombinant proteins, but they are not immunogenic. These results led us to consider… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Immunization or boosting with V1/V2 scaffolds may be the most effective way to improve the relative magnitude of antibody responses of the V1/V2 domain. In previous studies, we demonstrated that the V1/V2 domain possesses a highly conserved cathepsin D cleavage site that may diminish the immunogenicity of key epitopes in the V1/V2 domain by proteolytic degradation in vivo (93). Deletion of this site might also enhance the immunogenicity of this region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Immunization or boosting with V1/V2 scaffolds may be the most effective way to improve the relative magnitude of antibody responses of the V1/V2 domain. In previous studies, we demonstrated that the V1/V2 domain possesses a highly conserved cathepsin D cleavage site that may diminish the immunogenicity of key epitopes in the V1/V2 domain by proteolytic degradation in vivo (93). Deletion of this site might also enhance the immunogenicity of this region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Since binding of gp120 to CD4 requires elements of gp120's inner domain, outer domain and the bridging sheet, the presence of the disulfide bridge in the inner domain likely restricted the inherent flexibility of the molecule thereby affecting the accessibility needed for initial “docking” of CD4 to gp120, and hence the lower affinity of the stabilized gp120 for CD4 [17]. The affinity between gp120 (wild-type or other forms) and CD4 (4-domain, 2-domain or CD4-IgG2), measured previously particularly via non-SPR based methods [22], [23], showed sub-nanomolar affinity. The observed relative difference in affinity via non-SPR methods could be due to differences in the strains of the gp120 used, the expression system and level of purity of the gp120 protein, the buffer systems used and/or their linear range of quantitation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most likely then the mutations in Env cause it to assume a more closed conformation in which protease cleavage sites are less accessible. It is possible that digestion of Env immunogens in vivo restricts elicitation of certain Abs [72], [73], so incorporation of comb-mut mutations into Env trimer-based immunogens might offer a level of protection against such degradation. We note that the specific enzymes used here would not be encountered at the site of vaccination, but comb-mut Env trimers are resistant to a cocktail of multiple proteases with different specificities so the effect may be more general.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%