2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0301-4797(02)00185-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protected forests in Europe approaches-harmonising the definitions for international comparison and forest policy making

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
2
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
41
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Modelling climate condition changes in relation to the European beech can provide support for the development of strategies of adaptation measures in forest stands dominated by the species. They also provide a science-based rationale for forest management decisions [48] based on the adaptation approach to forest ecosystems [49]. Forest management adaptation strategies [50] aimed at sustainability must take into account a range of economic [51] and social aspects [52][53][54].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modelling climate condition changes in relation to the European beech can provide support for the development of strategies of adaptation measures in forest stands dominated by the species. They also provide a science-based rationale for forest management decisions [48] based on the adaptation approach to forest ecosystems [49]. Forest management adaptation strategies [50] aimed at sustainability must take into account a range of economic [51] and social aspects [52][53][54].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Countries such as Sweden and Finland, which have extensive forest covers and where forestry plays an important role for the GNP, practice relatively intensive forestry, including clear-cutting, planting rather than natural regeneration, even-age stands, and fertilization [24]. On the other hand, in these countries, the forests have often been described as semi-natural, given that they cover large areas [25]. Other countries, such as Slovenia, practice close-to-nature forestry to a large extent, using mainly natural regeneration and retaining natural age structures in stands.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Slovenian report notes that the country uses a variation of silvicultural systems which include logging for group and single-stem selection and create a patchy forest structure with mixed, uneven-aged stands. However, forest areas in continental Europe are more often smaller and fragmented [25]. While they may be managed more for "naturalistic" characteristics (ibid.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A notable difference between the cases is the fact that Ontario introduced a provincial loan guarantee program, while Swedish forestry is largely operating without state grants (although exceptions exist, such as the possibilities to apply for state loans for smaller operations). In Sweden, the comparatively large industry ownership ("Europe's highest commercial forest ownership", [57]) may offer increased opportunities for forest industry to adapt to change, and also means that questions of tenure or ownership are not pronounced in a fashion similar to that in Ontario. Indeed the high level of provincial forest ownership in Ontario suggests a state responsibility and therefore strong opportunity for provincial leaders to initiate regional adaptation and preparedness strategies in the forest sector.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%