1999
DOI: 10.1001/archinte.159.2.182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protection Against Influenza After Annually Repeated Vaccination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
85
2
9

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
10
85
2
9
Order By: Relevance
“…We could not establish a statistically significant difference in effectiveness as compared with those few subjects who received the vaccine for the first time. This is in agreement with the findings of Beyer et al who did not observe modified vaccine effectiveness resulting from prior immunization in a large metaanalysis [33].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…We could not establish a statistically significant difference in effectiveness as compared with those few subjects who received the vaccine for the first time. This is in agreement with the findings of Beyer et al who did not observe modified vaccine effectiveness resulting from prior immunization in a large metaanalysis [33].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Annually repeated vaccinations do not lead to a decreasing immune response or protection [294]. Although much less studied, repeated vaccinations annually, or even more frequent, do not lead to more side-effects than after primary vaccination [294,295].…”
Section: Is Vaccination Cost-effective?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the proportion of baseline seropositive subjects was inversely correlated with seroconversion. A previous meta‐analysis of annual vaccination studies found no difference in seroprotection rates between unvaccinated and previously vaccinated individuals 90 . However, individuals with high baseline titers may easily achieve the seroprotection threshold, but may not be able to generate a fourfold increase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%