1988
DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(88)90107-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protection against noise trauma by pre-exposure to a low level acoustic stimulus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
94
1
4

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
94
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been demonstrated in the cat, guinea pig 6) , rabbit 7) , chinchilla 8,9) and human 10) . Noise of 85-100 dB SPL has been proved to be the best intensity for inducing the effect of sound conditioning, and the effect is in proportion to noise intensity in this narrow range [11][12][13] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been demonstrated in the cat, guinea pig 6) , rabbit 7) , chinchilla 8,9) and human 10) . Noise of 85-100 dB SPL has been proved to be the best intensity for inducing the effect of sound conditioning, and the effect is in proportion to noise intensity in this narrow range [11][12][13] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We do not know whether targeted stimulation needs to be continued as long as in the present study. Previous studies (Canlon et al, 1988) have suggested a beneficial effect of acoustic stimulation in protecting the auditory system. Moreover, it has been shown that age-related hearing loss is reduced by life-long acoustic stimulation (Willott and Bross, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, noiseinduced hearing loss is assumed to be permanent. In this context, it is well established that sound conditioning before inducing a noise trauma reduces the amount of hearing loss (Canlon et al, 1988;Niu and Canlon, 2002;Niu et al, 2003). More interestingly, one study found that unilateral removal of middle ear ossicles after an acoustic trauma, resulting in an attenuation of environmental sound of ϳ50 dB over a wide frequency band (250 Hz to 8 kHz), is associated with greater hearing loss in that ear compared with that in the opposite ear with intact middle ear (Fukushima et al, 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 and 12 indicates that while ATS across all tested frequencies was similar, there was a large difference in OHC loss between the G and the two nonG groups [i.e., between the b(t) exposed in the industrial noise environment the above result emphasizes the often-observed lack of correlation between various measures of threshold having a recoverable component (i.e., compound threshold shifts) and permanent threshold shifts. Interrupting a noise exposure for a significant period of time over the course of a chronic exposure should lead to a reduced traumatic effect either as a consequence of the partial or complete recovery of thresholds during the silent periods, or as a result of the toughening effect (Miller et al, 1963;Clark et al, 1987;and others), or under some conditions of exposure, the conditioning effect (Canlon et al, 1988). The above statement can be tested by comparing the results of the 5 day continuous exposures and the 19 day interrupted exposures, i.e., a comparison between pairs of G and nonG groups shown in Figs.…”
Section: Fig 7 Group Mean (A) Permanent Threshold Shift (Pts) (B) mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experiments described below were designed to test this hypothesis. However, the experimental design also allowed for (a) a replication or reinforcement of earlier results that showed increased trauma produced by nonG exposures relative to equivalent energy G exposures (Hamernik et al, 2003b;Hamernik and Qiu, 2001;Lei et al, 1994); (b) an evaluation of the equal energy principle as it applies to interrupted/intermittent noise exposures Hamernik et al, 2007); and (c) the effect of toughening/conditioning (Miller et al, 1963;Clark et al, 1987;Canlon et al, 1988;Hamernik et al, 2003aHamernik et al, , 1994Hamernik and Ahroon, 1999) on the resultant hearing and sensory cell loss.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%