2019
DOI: 10.4049/immunohorizons.1900064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protection from Endotoxin Shock by Selective Targeting of Proinflammatory Signaling to the Nucleus Mediated by Importin Alpha 5

Abstract: Endotoxin shock is induced by LPS, one of the most potent virulence factors of the Gram-negative bacteria that cause sepsis. It remains unknown if either proinflammatory stress-responsive transcription factors (SRTFs), ferried to nucleus by importin a5, or lipidregulating sterol regulatory element binding proteins (SREBPs), transported to the nucleus by importin b1, mediate endotoxin shock. A novel cell-penetrating peptide targeting importin a5 while sparing importin b1 protected 80% of animals from death in r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, we compared the effect of treatment with two monoselective NTM peptides, cSN50.1α and cSN50.1β, to the effect of treatment with the biselective NTM, cSN50.1 peptide on nuclear translocation of SRTFs and MTFs in cell-based essays. Targeting Imp α5-mediated nuclear import by the monoselective NTM, cSN50.1α peptide, inhibited the nuclear translocation of NF-κB RelA, consistent with previous result in different models of microbial inflammation 30 (Fig. 2 A).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…First, we compared the effect of treatment with two monoselective NTM peptides, cSN50.1α and cSN50.1β, to the effect of treatment with the biselective NTM, cSN50.1 peptide on nuclear translocation of SRTFs and MTFs in cell-based essays. Targeting Imp α5-mediated nuclear import by the monoselective NTM, cSN50.1α peptide, inhibited the nuclear translocation of NF-κB RelA, consistent with previous result in different models of microbial inflammation 30 (Fig. 2 A).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%