2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12283-020-00325-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protective capacity of ice hockey helmets at different levels of striking compliance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Peak vertical forces were, however, lowest for the first impact for 73% of the protectors, indicating that they may have degraded with changes to padding and fatigue of splints. This finding suggests that protectors may need to be replaced after a severe fall onto the hand, even if there is no visible damage, as found for ice hockey helmets 52 and in line with general guidance for helmets. Fatigue of the splints may have also occurred under the quasi-static bend testing of the protectors before impact testing.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Peak vertical forces were, however, lowest for the first impact for 73% of the protectors, indicating that they may have degraded with changes to padding and fatigue of splints. This finding suggests that protectors may need to be replaced after a severe fall onto the hand, even if there is no visible damage, as found for ice hockey helmets 52 and in line with general guidance for helmets. Fatigue of the splints may have also occurred under the quasi-static bend testing of the protectors before impact testing.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…To enable the rig to match the loading rate applied to a cadaveric forearm by Greenwald et al, 36 compliant material was added to an aluminum plate (400 mm by 120 mm by 180 mm) that was bolted to the end of the pendulum arm, as done by de Grau et al 52 when testing helmets with a linear impactor. Impacts were conducted with the surrogate hand at maximum extension (∼110° from vertical), so the impactor struck the central core analogous to the wrist.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limitations of the video analysis method and impact reconstructions used in the present study have been previously described ( Ghajari et al, 2017 ; Karton et al, 2020 ) and within the supplementary materials , but these methods still remain one of the key approaches to determining the kinematics of the head during sports collisions. We used an unbiased neckform which has been shown to be repeatable and typically gives very small standard deviations on series of impacts to various locations ( Chen et al, 2020 ; de Grau et al, 2020 ; Post et al, 2020 ). The unbiased neck has been shown to perform similarly to the Hybrid-III neck ( Walsh et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…shoulder, elbow, or glove-to-head impact) [30,31]. During collisions, the helmet impacts several layers of textiles, protective equipment, and the other player's body, which are typically less stiff than helmet liners [32,33]. Player-toplayer collision head impacts are associated with lower magnitude, but longer duration, head accelerations in comparison to falls onto the ice or against the boards surrounding the ice rink [32,34,35].…”
Section: Motivation For the Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the requirement to protect well during falls, helmet liners have to be sufficiently stiff. Consequently, compression when impacting a more compliant body is insufficient to efficiently absorb induced energy, leaving players susceptible to concussions [32,33,39]. Designs to protect against a wider range of head impacts, especially player-to-player collisions, such as multilayer foam or shear-thickening polymers, have been introduced with limited success [40][41][42][43].…”
Section: Motivation For the Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%