2016
DOI: 10.1016/s0254-6272(17)30003-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protective effect of Xuebijing injection on myocardial injury in patients with sepsis: a randomized clinical trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No additional AE occurrence was identified in this study. Furthermore, no serious AEs were observed to be associated with XBJ, which was consistent with those of the previous reports . At least one reason may be responsible for the low rate of XBJ-associated SAEs in the patients with sepsis in the current trial.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…No additional AE occurrence was identified in this study. Furthermore, no serious AEs were observed to be associated with XBJ, which was consistent with those of the previous reports . At least one reason may be responsible for the low rate of XBJ-associated SAEs in the patients with sepsis in the current trial.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Recent studies have indicated that there are anti-inflammatory, anticoagulation, and immunoregulatory effects of moderate XBJ in animal models of sepsis . Clinical evidence was provided by the limited studies that were focused on the improvement of organ dysfunction, but there has been a lack of conclusive effect on mortality thus far. In patients with sepsis, independent meta-analysis found significant association with XBJ use; however, the small sample sizes and limited methodological quality may have affected the robustness and credibility of these findings .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A Meta-analysis by Song et al demonstrated that combining XBJ with conventional intervention is superior to conventional intervention alone in treating MODS (Song et al, 2018). The benefits of XBJ to different organs (including lung, kidney, heart, and liver) were reported in a series of clinical studies (Fang and Wang, 2013;Wang et al, 2015;Zhang et al, 2016;Gao et al, 2018;Song et al, 2018) (Song et al, 2019). In a small-scale prospective, single-center, randomized doubleblinded trial, Gao et al found XBJ significantly lowered IL-1β, IL-8, and C-reactive protein in blood and up-regulated IL-10 in blood and decreased adverse events in patients with lung injury (Gao et al, 2018).…”
Section: Xbj and Organ Failurementioning
confidence: 96%
“…In a small-scale prospective, single-center, randomized doubleblinded trial, Gao et al found XBJ significantly lowered IL-1β, IL-8, and C-reactive protein in blood and up-regulated IL-10 in blood and decreased adverse events in patients with lung injury (Gao et al, 2018). Zhang et al found XBJ improved myocardial function in patients with septic myocardial injury, indicated by improving cardiac troponin I, N-terminal proB-type natriuretic peptide, and procalcitonin in blood samples of patients (Zhang et al, 2016).…”
Section: Xbj and Organ Failurementioning
confidence: 99%