2004
DOI: 10.1021/la0357662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protein Diffusion in Charged Nanotubes:  “On−Off” Behavior of Molecular Transport

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
84
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
5
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The curve illustrates three zones: for pH Յ 7 and pH Ն 9, the diffusion of lectin through the nanochannel is slow, whereas the diffusion is significantly faster for pH values between 7 and 9. Three peaks are visible in this part of the curve, one at pH = 7.5, a second at pH = 8.2, and a third at pH = 8.8, and they can be attributed to the pI values of the three proteins, showing a maximal diffusion coefficient through the nanochannel if they are neutral and do not have electrostatic interactions with channel walls ͑Burns and Zydney, 1999; Chun and Stroeve, 2002;Ku and Stroeve, 2004͒. For pH Ն 9, all three proteins are negatively charged and excluded from the nanochannel according to the EEE ͓Eq.…”
Section: Electrostatic Sieving Of Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The curve illustrates three zones: for pH Յ 7 and pH Ն 9, the diffusion of lectin through the nanochannel is slow, whereas the diffusion is significantly faster for pH values between 7 and 9. Three peaks are visible in this part of the curve, one at pH = 7.5, a second at pH = 8.2, and a third at pH = 8.8, and they can be attributed to the pI values of the three proteins, showing a maximal diffusion coefficient through the nanochannel if they are neutral and do not have electrostatic interactions with channel walls ͑Burns and Zydney, 1999; Chun and Stroeve, 2002;Ku and Stroeve, 2004͒. For pH Ն 9, all three proteins are negatively charged and excluded from the nanochannel according to the EEE ͓Eq.…”
Section: Electrostatic Sieving Of Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Synthetic nanopores of dimensions comparable to the size of biological macromolecules such as proteins 1,2 and DNA ͑Refs. 3-5͒ have potential applications in singleparticle detection, analysis, and separation of biomolecules.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the transport problem involves typically ͑at least͒ three length scales: the biomolecule size, the nanopore dimensions, and the screening Debye length. 1,2,6,9 We will consider here, both theoretically and experimentally, the relative roles of the last two length scales for the case of conical nanopores obtained using the track-etching technique. [10][11][12][13][14] Irradiation of polymer films such as polyethylene terephthalate ͑PET͒ with heavy ions and subsequent etching with alkali of the latent particle tracks allow the preparation of synthetic pores with diameters from few nanometers to the micrometer range.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar phenomena of the effect of electrostatic interaction on the protein diffusivity have been reported, and the possible reasons have been discussed. [34][35][36][37][38] For example, Salgin et al proposed that the decrease in BSA effective diffusion coefficient is because of the pore narrowing due to the increased adsorption when the membrane and protein had opposite charges. Ku and Stroeve 35 tried to explain from the standpoint of the diffusion potential, which was generated due to the repelling of the counter-ions by the charged membrane, and reduced the protein transport when the protein and the membrane had opposite charge properties.…”
Section: Adsorption Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%