2019
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protein features for assembly of the RNA editing helicase 2 subcomplex (REH2C) in Trypanosome holo-editosomes

Abstract: Uridylate insertion/deletion RNA editing in Trypanosoma brucei is a complex system that is not found in humans, so there is interest in targeting this system for drug development. This system uses hundreds of small non-coding guide RNAs (gRNAs) to modify the mitochondrial mRNA transcriptome. This process occurs in holo-editosomes that assemble several macromolecular trans factors around mRNA including the RNA-free RNA editing core complex (RECC) and auxiliary ribon… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences in the cell lines used (e.g., inoculum quality or growth rate) for each sample group, or our manipulation of the samples, may account for the variations in cumulative values between the two sample groups. Possible differences in REH2C protein subunit stoichiometry, as previously suggested after sedimentation analysis of mitochondrial extracts (Kumar et al 2019), may also cause cumulative differences between KREH2-IP and mtRNA samples versus KH2F1-IP and mtRNA samples. Notably, total editing in most ESs in the 5' half (approximately ES45-to-ES72) was relatively stable compared to the gradual decline in total editing in the 3' half.…”
Section: Distribution Of Editing Events and Analysis Of Total Editing In Rps12 From Mtrna Reh2c And Rescmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Differences in the cell lines used (e.g., inoculum quality or growth rate) for each sample group, or our manipulation of the samples, may account for the variations in cumulative values between the two sample groups. Possible differences in REH2C protein subunit stoichiometry, as previously suggested after sedimentation analysis of mitochondrial extracts (Kumar et al 2019), may also cause cumulative differences between KREH2-IP and mtRNA samples versus KH2F1-IP and mtRNA samples. Notably, total editing in most ESs in the 5' half (approximately ES45-to-ES72) was relatively stable compared to the gradual decline in total editing in the 3' half.…”
Section: Distribution Of Editing Events and Analysis Of Total Editing In Rps12 From Mtrna Reh2c And Rescmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…As above, the different cell lines for each group of samples or our manipulations of the samples may account for the variations in cumulative values between the two sample groups. Possible variations in REH2C protein subunit stoichiometry, as suggested above (Kumar et al 2019), could also cause cumulative differences between KREH2-IP and mtRNA samples versus KH2F1-IP and mtRNA samples. Several prominent spikes in Inc/Cor appeared to contribute to the differences between the cumulative curves of these samples.…”
Section: Resc-associated Rps12 Transcripts Exhibit Particularly Accurate Editingmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations