2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.11.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protein interactions with subcutaneously implanted biosensors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
79
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to study the biofouling properties of the samples they were immersed in BSA solutions for 24 hours at room temperature to compare the current responses for FcMeOH in H2SO4 or PBS before and after exposure to possibly fouling solutions. It has been previously shown that serum albumin adsorbs on Pt containing biosensor surface [49] which justifies the use of BSA as a model solution. Samples were also immersed in deionized water for reference.…”
Section: Biofoulingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to study the biofouling properties of the samples they were immersed in BSA solutions for 24 hours at room temperature to compare the current responses for FcMeOH in H2SO4 or PBS before and after exposure to possibly fouling solutions. It has been previously shown that serum albumin adsorbs on Pt containing biosensor surface [49] which justifies the use of BSA as a model solution. Samples were also immersed in deionized water for reference.…”
Section: Biofoulingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5 Other concerns such as direct long-term integration with the host have not been completely solved. [6][7][8][9] The primary challenge affecting subcutaneous implanted glucose sensors as well as any implanted sensing device has been overcoming the host foreign body response while retaining proper function, e.g., resistance to signal drift and calibration maintenance. 10,11 The immense tissue-integration challenges associated with in vivo glucose measurements have precluded the long-term implantation (1−4 weeks) of glucose sensors for continuous glucose monitoring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that the observed increase in the charge is not connected with the concentration of urea, but is related to the uric acid only. This increase in the charge in the presence of UA is a surprising result since most interfering compounds tend to foul, adhere to and block the surface of the electrode [39]. As a result, the signal is lost or lowered significantly.…”
Section: Selectivity Studies Of the Ppy-urs-scd Polymer Filmsmentioning
confidence: 97%