2019
DOI: 10.1002/prot.25654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protein model discrimination attempts using mutational sensitivity, predicted secondary structure, and model quality information

Abstract: Structure prediction methods often generate a large number of models for a target sequence. Even if the correct fold for the target sequence is sampled in this dataset, it is difficult to distinguish it from other decoy structures. An attempt to solve this problem using experimental mutational sensitivity data for the CcdB protein was described previously by exploiting the correlation of residue depth with mutational sensitivity (r ~ 0.6). We now show that such a correlation extends to four other proteins with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Deep mutational scanning data could contribute to the investigation of Aβ fibril structure beyond the analysis of existing models we present. For example, others have used site-saturation mutagenesis and deep mutational scanning data to evaluate proposed structural models (Bajaj et al 2008; Khare et al 2019). Additionally, deep mutational scanning data have now been used to generate distance constraints for the prediction of tertiary protein structure (Schmiedel and Lehner 2018; Rollins et al 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deep mutational scanning data could contribute to the investigation of Aβ fibril structure beyond the analysis of existing models we present. For example, others have used site-saturation mutagenesis and deep mutational scanning data to evaluate proposed structural models (Bajaj et al 2008; Khare et al 2019). Additionally, deep mutational scanning data have now been used to generate distance constraints for the prediction of tertiary protein structure (Schmiedel and Lehner 2018; Rollins et al 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During this iterative process of model building, all the models build are compared and aligned by the program MODELLER and later these models were assessed by a number of criteria depending upon GA341 score and DOPE score. Therefore, for a target sequence to be the best model, the GA341 score equal or near to 1 and the lowest DOPE score is considered [41]. Now this model is regarded as the target for in silico docking studies (Figure 1).…”
Section: Results and Discussion 31 In Silico Validation By Targeting Hbcatc In The Neuropathic Pains 311 Homology Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present analysis distinguishes between the above possibilities, and is therefore able to distinguish buried from exposed, active-site positions. This is useful for applications that attempt to use saturation mutagenesis data for protein model discrimination and structure prediction [63,64] as well as interpreting clinical data on disease causing mutations [65,66] MFIseq (bind) was also used to predict the Tm of CcdB mutants. We found a good correlation between predicted and measured ΔTm for a subset of CcdB mutants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%