Paramagnetism in Experimental Biomolecular NMR 2018
DOI: 10.1039/9781788013291-00134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protein–Protein Interactions

Abstract: Paramagnetic NMR methods are excellently suited for the study of protein-protein complexes in solution. Intermolecular pseudocontact shifts (PCSs), residual dipolar couplings (RDCs) and paramagnetic relaxations enhancements (PRE) can be used, ideally in combination, for docking proteins and determining their orientation in the complex. PCSs can be used for breaking the structure symmetry in dimer complexes. PCSs also can be applied to detect structural differences in proteins and protein complexes in solution … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, PREs are powerful tools for the detection of minor states or the characterization of ensembles of conformations, such as found in intrinsically disordered proteins or encounter complexes. 33,34,584 At the same time, the strong distance dependence of the PRE adds uncertainties to distance measurements of major conformations, when minor conformations or alternative interactions featuring short distances r IS contribute disproportionally to the observed PRE. Minor species populated as low as 0.1% can be manifested in the observed PRE in this way.…”
Section: Complications In Pre-to-distance Conversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, PREs are powerful tools for the detection of minor states or the characterization of ensembles of conformations, such as found in intrinsically disordered proteins or encounter complexes. 33,34,584 At the same time, the strong distance dependence of the PRE adds uncertainties to distance measurements of major conformations, when minor conformations or alternative interactions featuring short distances r IS contribute disproportionally to the observed PRE. Minor species populated as low as 0.1% can be manifested in the observed PRE in this way.…”
Section: Complications In Pre-to-distance Conversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With restraints from multiple tagging sites, PCSs of backbone amide protons have been shown to be sufficient for 3D structure determinations of proteins (Schmitz et al, 2012;Yagi et al, 2013;Pilla et al, 2016Pilla et al, , 2017Cucuzza et al, 2021). Particularly appealing applications of PCSs have been the structure refinement of polypeptide segments in proteins of known 3D fold (Banci et al, 1996;Crick et al, 2015;Lescanne et al, 2018;Müntener et al, 2020) and the structural characterisation of the interfaces of protein-protein (Pintacuda et al, 2006;Keizers et al, 2010;Kobashigawa et al, 2012;Hass and Ubbink, 2014;de la Cruz et al, 2011;Brewer et al, 2015;Ubbink and Di Savino, 2018) and protein-ligand complexes (Pintacuda et al, 2007;Guan et al, 2013;Chen et al, 2016;Lescanne et al, 2018;Zimmermann et al, 2019), as the long-range nature of PCSs allows the attachment of the H. W. Orton et al: Localising nuclear spins by pseudocontact shifts from a single tagging site metal tags at a distance that is sufficiently far from the site of interest to avoid structural perturbations by the tag.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of paramagnetic metal tags for biomolecular PCS NMR was covered in numerous general reviews, and specific aspects like dynamics, conformational changes, sparse data, in-cell NMR, tag design, protein interactions, and domain motions have also been addressed. The current and future role of PCSs for structural life sciences was discussed in perspective contributions by Otting, , Ubbink, and others. Several excellent recent monographs embed PCSs into the context of other biomolecular NMR methods. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%