2017
DOI: 10.1249/mss.0000000000001224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protein Supplementation Does Not Affect Myogenic Adaptations to Resistance Training

Abstract: It has been proposed that protein supplementation during resistance exercise training enhances muscle hypertrophy. The degree of hypertrophy during training is controlled in part through activation of satellite cells and myonuclear accretion. Purpose To determine the efficacy of protein supplementation (and the type of protein) during traditional resistance training on myofiber cross-sectional-area, satellite cell content and myonuclear addition. Methods Healthy young men participated in supervised whole bo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
30
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
3
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding suggests that the long-term administration of leucine in the absence of resistance exercise training may not induce skeletal muscle hypertrophy. Previous studies claiming that leucine can induce hypertrophy by increasing the phosphorylation of proteins in protein synthesis signaling pathways, including the S6K1 and 4EBP1 signaling pathways, have mostly investigated the acute effects of leucine (Norton and Layman 2006;Dreyer et al 2008;Reidy et al 2017). In addition, Koopman et al (2008), and Pereira et al (2014) reported that leucine supplementation is effective during the early stages of protein synthesis, and induces skeletal muscle repair or regeneration, rather than hypertrophy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This finding suggests that the long-term administration of leucine in the absence of resistance exercise training may not induce skeletal muscle hypertrophy. Previous studies claiming that leucine can induce hypertrophy by increasing the phosphorylation of proteins in protein synthesis signaling pathways, including the S6K1 and 4EBP1 signaling pathways, have mostly investigated the acute effects of leucine (Norton and Layman 2006;Dreyer et al 2008;Reidy et al 2017). In addition, Koopman et al (2008), and Pereira et al (2014) reported that leucine supplementation is effective during the early stages of protein synthesis, and induces skeletal muscle repair or regeneration, rather than hypertrophy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Reidy et al. ). Accordingly, the rats were anesthetized using inhalation anesthetics (isoflurane), and the extensor digitorum longus (EDL) muscle, about 98% of which contains type II fibers, was removed (Armstrong and Phelps ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…<0.001), and DAVID indicated that the following functionally-annotated pathways were upregulated (FDR value <0.05): a) glycolysis (8 proteins), b) acetylation (23 proteins), c) gluconeogenesis (5 proteins) and d) cytoplasm (20 proteins). At W7, sarcoplasmic protein concentrations remained higher than PRE INTRODUCTION Weeks to months of resistance training increases skeletal muscle mean fiber crosssectional area (fCSA) [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Tracer studies have also demonstrated that a single bout of resistance exercise increases muscle protein synthesis (MPS) and myofibrillar protein synthesis (MyoPS) rates up to 72 hours post-exercise (reviewed in [11][12][13]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the available evidence supporting the benefits of protein supplementation, mainly from whey, to maximize muscle mass gain, there are still some controversial results 7,8 questioning the effectiveness of using protein for supporting muscle mass accretion in recreationally trained participants. It is likely that some uncontrolled factors, such as the type and quality of the protein source, the protocol of ingestion, including the dose per singular intake, timing of ingestion, eating patterns, including meal frequency and macronutrient distribution, the coingestion of other nutrients, and the energy content of the daily diet could have caused discrepancies between studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%