2015
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proteins in Art, Archaeology, and Paleontology: From Detection to Identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
79
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 607 publications
0
79
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While a method, called peptide mass fingerprint, is widely known for the straightforward identification of proteins in the biomedical field39 and it has been successfully adapted to the study of proteins in samples from cultural heritage40, the identification of plant gums is still challenging and this paper aims to exceed these obstacles by adapting metabolomics-like strategies41. The strategy consists of the partial enzymatic digestion of the natural polymers with glycoside hydrolases followed by MALDI-TOF MS and MS/MS analysis of the released oligosaccharides.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a method, called peptide mass fingerprint, is widely known for the straightforward identification of proteins in the biomedical field39 and it has been successfully adapted to the study of proteins in samples from cultural heritage40, the identification of plant gums is still challenging and this paper aims to exceed these obstacles by adapting metabolomics-like strategies41. The strategy consists of the partial enzymatic digestion of the natural polymers with glycoside hydrolases followed by MALDI-TOF MS and MS/MS analysis of the released oligosaccharides.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, chemical modifications occurring to a variable extent in paint layers upon ageing [1114], can still impair positive protein identification [36]. In other words, if the detection of specific peptides univocally identifies a protein in a sample, the non-identification of specific peptides does not necessarily rule out the presence of a protein.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EVA technology has the unique property of leaving intact the items under analysis, yet collecting enough surface material for permitting subsequent instrumental analysis such as GC‐MS or high‐resolution proteomics with advanced mass spectrometers. There are several other techniques for exploring surfaces, such as UV/Vis, fluorescence analysis, IR, and other types of spectroscopies, which however do not permit collection of surface material for chemical analyses . When this is performed, one has to sacrifice (even if minimally) a portion of the item being scrutinized, thus permanently damaging our cultural heritage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%