2006
DOI: 10.1039/b609871a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proteome-on-a-chip: Mirage, or on the horizon?

Abstract: Proteomics has emerged as the next great scientific challenge in the post-genome era. But even the most basic form of proteomics, proteome profiling, i.e., identifying all of the proteins expressed in a given sample, has proven to be a demanding task. The proteome presents unique analytical challenges, including significant molecular diversity, an extremely wide concentration range, and a tendency to adsorb to solid surfaces. Microfluidics has been touted as being a useful tool for developing new methods to so… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
93
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
(161 reference statements)
0
93
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Until recently, the main focus has been placed on the separation of long DNA molecules ͑Chou et al, Lander et al, 2001͒, limitations in gel electrophoresis ͑Turmel et al, 1990Gygi et al, 2000;Lambert et al, 2005͒, and well-known DNA separation physics ͑Giddings, 1965de Gennes, 1979;Stellwagen et al, 1997;Righetti et al, 2002;Slater et al, 2003͒. The interest in separation techniques for smaller physiologically relevant biomolecules is increasing ͑Corthals et al, 1997; Anderson and Anderson, 1998;Rabilloud, 2002;Freire and Wheeler, 2006͒.…”
Section: Macromolecule Separation Mechanisms Using Nanometer-sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until recently, the main focus has been placed on the separation of long DNA molecules ͑Chou et al, Lander et al, 2001͒, limitations in gel electrophoresis ͑Turmel et al, 1990Gygi et al, 2000;Lambert et al, 2005͒, and well-known DNA separation physics ͑Giddings, 1965de Gennes, 1979;Stellwagen et al, 1997;Righetti et al, 2002;Slater et al, 2003͒. The interest in separation techniques for smaller physiologically relevant biomolecules is increasing ͑Corthals et al, 1997; Anderson and Anderson, 1998;Rabilloud, 2002;Freire and Wheeler, 2006͒.…”
Section: Macromolecule Separation Mechanisms Using Nanometer-sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The small sample and reagent requirements, rapid analysis times, high throughput processing capabilities, and low operating costs are among the driving forces for the development of these systems [5][6][7][8]. Different microfluidic devices have been applied to specific aspects of protein processing, in particular, protein purification and separation, protein digestion, and protein identification by mass spectrometry [9].There have been a number of approaches to on-line and off-line matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry (MALDI-MS) integrated to chipbased devices [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. The primary advantage of the MALDI approach compared with electrospray ionization (ESI) when coupling to microfluidic chips is the potential for multiplexing [19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The small sample and reagent requirements, rapid analysis times, high throughput processing capabilities, and low operating costs are among the driving forces for the development of these systems [5][6][7][8]. Different microfluidic devices have been applied to specific aspects of protein processing, in particular, protein purification and separation, protein digestion, and protein identification by mass spectrometry [9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ultimate goal is micrototal analysis systems, [4] which additionally offer automation and parallelization to meet the demands of highsample throughput and high-sample complexity typical of screening applications and proteomics workflows. [5,6] Experimental efforts of coupling microfluidic devices to mass spectrometers started a decade ago and are of on-going interest. [7 -9] Microfluidic flow rates are well suited to the requirements of electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (ESI-MS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%