2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proteome-wide Capture of Co-translational Protein Dynamics in Bacillus subtilis Using TnDR, a Transposable Protein-Dynamics Reporter

Abstract: Highlights d TnDR is an arrest-sequence-based and transposable protein-dynamics reporter d TnDR captures co-translational protein localization and assembly d Proteome-wide screening has been conducted d Co-translational protein maturation is a frequently occurring event in the cell

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For an arrest peptide to function as a Sec- or YidC-monitoring substrate, the translation arrest must be released in a secretion- or membrane-insertion-dependent manner 27 . An optimal distance between the N-terminal TM segment and the arrest site is crucial for the membrane-insertion-dependent arrest cancellation if the TM segment adopts the type I (N-out/C-in) orientation 36,37 , which is a topology that is often observed for YidC substrates 38 . Conversely, this distance can vary without impairing the localization-dependent arrest release if the N-terminal localization signal is either the Sec-dependent secretion signal or type II (N-in/C-out) TM segment 37 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For an arrest peptide to function as a Sec- or YidC-monitoring substrate, the translation arrest must be released in a secretion- or membrane-insertion-dependent manner 27 . An optimal distance between the N-terminal TM segment and the arrest site is crucial for the membrane-insertion-dependent arrest cancellation if the TM segment adopts the type I (N-out/C-in) orientation 36,37 , which is a topology that is often observed for YidC substrates 38 . Conversely, this distance can vary without impairing the localization-dependent arrest release if the N-terminal localization signal is either the Sec-dependent secretion signal or type II (N-in/C-out) TM segment 37 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An optimal distance between the N-terminal TM segment and the arrest site is crucial for the membrane-insertion-dependent arrest cancellation if the TM segment adopts the type I (N-out/C-in) orientation 36,37 , which is a topology that is often observed for YidC substrates 38 . Conversely, this distance can vary without impairing the localization-dependent arrest release if the N-terminal localization signal is either the Sec-dependent secretion signal or type II (N-in/C-out) TM segment 37 . We envisioned that this trend might be shared by known monitoring substrates, i.e., SecM, MifM, and VemP, as well as by other arrest peptides if they actually function as monitoring substrates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using such a simulation approach, we postulate that explaining the translation-enhancing mechanism may be through mechanical forces generated between MSKIK and RAPs during translation. In addition, because many RAPs other than SecM or CmlA leader have been found (Su et al, 2021),and a recent study showed a force-sensitive arrest by MifM in Bacillus subtilis was cancelled by N-terminally adjacent dynamic nascent chain (Fujiwara et al, 2020), we expect that there are still many translation-promoting peptides remain to be undiscovered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rare codons have also been shown to be positioned to facilitate interactions between nascent proteins and the signal recognition particle ( Pechmann et al., 2014 ) as well as with other proteins in the cell ( Chartier et al , 2012 ). However, rare codons are not the only factor that influences translation times: mRNA structure ( Hershey et al , 2012 ), the chemistry of the amino acid being added to the nascent protein ( Artieri and Fraser, 2014 ; Pavlov et al., 2009 ), mechanical forces generated by nascent proteins ( Fritch et al , 2018 ; Fujiwara et al , 2020 ; Leininger et al., 2019 ) and interactions between the nascent protein and the ribosome ( Gumbart et al , 2012 ) are all part of the picture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%