2006
DOI: 10.1002/elps.200500562
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proteomic analysis of the mouse brain following protein enrichment by preparative electrophoresis

Abstract: Proteomics is a powerful technology to study the identity and levels of brain proteins. Changes of protein levels as well as modifications that occur in neurological disorders may be informative for the pathogenesis of these disorders and could result in the identification of potential drug targets and disease markers. To increase the capability of characterizing complex protein profiles, protein mixtures should be separated into simpler fractions, thus increasing the likelihood of detecting low-abundance prot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, to put our results in perspectives, exploration of the rat brain proteome directly from whole brain tissue by 2D-GE had started with the identification of 210 proteins (a number comparable to what we covered by our rapid proteomics survey in the mouse cortex), which implicated the applicability of the methodology only to abundant brain proteins. Additional developments, including the use of large-gel formats to improve electrophoretic separation and attention to pre-electrophoretic enrichment of low-abundance gene products, , have maintained the viability of this methodology despite its recognized shortcomings upon analyses of complex protein mixtures , and, unfortunately, at the cost of decreasing throughput. The premise of the presented label-free approach to explore differential protein expressions should also be viewed in a similar context.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to put our results in perspectives, exploration of the rat brain proteome directly from whole brain tissue by 2D-GE had started with the identification of 210 proteins (a number comparable to what we covered by our rapid proteomics survey in the mouse cortex), which implicated the applicability of the methodology only to abundant brain proteins. Additional developments, including the use of large-gel formats to improve electrophoretic separation and attention to pre-electrophoretic enrichment of low-abundance gene products, , have maintained the viability of this methodology despite its recognized shortcomings upon analyses of complex protein mixtures , and, unfortunately, at the cost of decreasing throughput. The premise of the presented label-free approach to explore differential protein expressions should also be viewed in a similar context.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spectral counting is a protein-centric approach that is less reliable for trace and/or low mass proteins; and less responsive toward small changes in response (<2 orders of magnitude) [11, 55], favoring higher abundance “average” proteins [2], while lower identification rates for proteins with low sequence coverage and nontryptic or fewer peptides are a consequence of the methods used for identification as much as the dynamic range of the sample and the limited duty cycle of the MS instrument [56]. This approach has been modified into forms such as the exponentially modified protein abundance index [57] and absolute protein expression profiling [58]. …”
Section: Strengths and Limitations Of Mass Spectrometry-based Quanmentioning
confidence: 99%