2005
DOI: 10.1021/ac050586d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proteomics:  from Gel Based to Gel Free

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
83
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 178 publications
0
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, gel-based methods provide more reliable inference of posttranslational modifications (see Supplemental Table 5 online). Moreover, 22 proteins of the GC proteome were exclusively identified by gel-based methods, indicating that gel-free methods cannot completely replace traditional gel-based methods (Lambert et al, 2005). Although we evaluated the 22 proteins for common characteristics (e.g., molecular weight, pI, predicted subcellular localization, and the predicted trypsin-digestion patterns of these protein sequences) that might have enhanced their detection by gel-based over gel-free methods, no such characteristics could be identified.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Three Proteomic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, gel-based methods provide more reliable inference of posttranslational modifications (see Supplemental Table 5 online). Moreover, 22 proteins of the GC proteome were exclusively identified by gel-based methods, indicating that gel-free methods cannot completely replace traditional gel-based methods (Lambert et al, 2005). Although we evaluated the 22 proteins for common characteristics (e.g., molecular weight, pI, predicted subcellular localization, and the predicted trypsin-digestion patterns of these protein sequences) that might have enhanced their detection by gel-based over gel-free methods, no such characteristics could be identified.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Three Proteomic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative approach is the gel-free proteomics technology, which is more suitable for the analysis of proteins with low abundance in complex samples. [7,17,24]. Separation of proteins using gel-free techniques revolutionized the study of proteome in the cell [24,25].…”
Section: Fluorescent Two-dimensional "Difference Gel Electrophoresis"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most successful approach, named "shotgun" or Multidimensional protein identification technology (MudPIT),), employs tryptic digestion of the entire protein mixture and analysis of the peptides with the combination of nanoscale liquid chromatography and electrospray tandem mass spectrometry [16,17]. In the gel-free workflow, several combinations of peptide separation methods can be used prior to LC-MS/MS analysis, including strong cation exchange and reversed phase high-performance liquid chromatography, liquid phase isoelectric focusing, and capillary electrophoresis [18]. As a "hybrid" alternative, a combination of SDS-PAGE, ingel digestion and LC-MS/MS (named GeLC-MS/MS) can be also employed [19].…”
Section: Current Technologies Enabling Qualitative and Quantitative Amentioning
confidence: 99%