1985
DOI: 10.1515/flih.1985.6.2.183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proto-Indo-European Glottalic Stops: The Comparative Evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is so because the change T > D does not go anymore against the 'main direction' (see section 2.4), i.e. act 3 of Grimm's Law, which has now become T' > T. This assumption, which has been endorsed by Kortlandt (1985), solves three major problems mentioned in section 3: that of the relative chronology of the laws of Grimm and Verner, that of the non-monotonicity of the shifts, as well as that of the non-application of occlusivization to s. Fourthly, it can now be assumed that a spirantization process has applied to certain voiced stops, rather than that a less likely occlusivation process applied to voiced fricatives. Thus, the diagram of the Germanic sound changes in (9) can now be modified and simplified: Grimm's Law and Verner's Law under the Glottalic Theory and the relative ordering proposed by Vennemann (1984) PIE…”
Section: The Position Of Proto-germanic and Sanskrit Compared To Protmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is so because the change T > D does not go anymore against the 'main direction' (see section 2.4), i.e. act 3 of Grimm's Law, which has now become T' > T. This assumption, which has been endorsed by Kortlandt (1985), solves three major problems mentioned in section 3: that of the relative chronology of the laws of Grimm and Verner, that of the non-monotonicity of the shifts, as well as that of the non-application of occlusivization to s. Fourthly, it can now be assumed that a spirantization process has applied to certain voiced stops, rather than that a less likely occlusivation process applied to voiced fricatives. Thus, the diagram of the Germanic sound changes in (9) can now be modified and simplified: Grimm's Law and Verner's Law under the Glottalic Theory and the relative ordering proposed by Vennemann (1984) PIE…”
Section: The Position Of Proto-germanic and Sanskrit Compared To Protmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Due to the typological improbability of the classic view on the PIE obstruent inventory (as mentioned in the previous section), this view has come increasingly under attack. Emonds (1972), Hopper (1973Hopper ( , 1997aHopper ( , b, 1982, Gamkredlidze & Ivanov (1973, 1995, Haudricourt (1975), Vennemann (1984), Kortlandt (1985Kortlandt ( , 1988 and Haider (1985) have all produced alternatives to the classic inventory, whereby, with the exceptions of Emonds and Haider, the voiced stops were replaced by voiceless glottalized stops (ejectives). 12 These models are subsumed under the name of 'Glottalic Theory'.…”
Section: The Position Of Proto-germanic and Sanskrit Compared To Protmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The antiquity of the English glottal stop is corroborated by glottalization in Danish, Latvian, Lithuanian, Armenian and Sindhi, and supported by indirect evidence from Indo-Iranian, Greek, Latin and Slavic (cf. Kortlandt 1985). This exemplifies once more the importance of re-examining time and again the primary data in linguistic reconstruction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Instead, I propose that Type IV is derived directly from Type I to which it is always adjacent. This has been considered impossible by Kortlandt (: 190–191), because the devoicing of the third series before de‐aspiration would cause a merger with the first series and the opposite (de‐aspiration before devoicing) would cause a merger with the second series. In reality, however, these predicted mergers are an artifact of the distinctive features linguists posit.…”
Section: Type IV Descendant From Type Imentioning
confidence: 99%