2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11276-012-0503-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protocol and architecture supports for network mobility with QoS-handover for high-velocity vehicles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, an extensible IP signaling architecture referred to as NSIS was developed. This protocol consists of two separated layers [28]: the lower layer called NSIS Transport Layer Protocol (NTLP) [30] provides a generic transport service for the higher layer called NSIS Signaling Layer Protocol (NSLP). QoS NSLP [29] is one of NSLP and designed for QoS signaling.…”
Section: Rsvp and Nsismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, an extensible IP signaling architecture referred to as NSIS was developed. This protocol consists of two separated layers [28]: the lower layer called NSIS Transport Layer Protocol (NTLP) [30] provides a generic transport service for the higher layer called NSIS Signaling Layer Protocol (NSLP). QoS NSLP [29] is one of NSLP and designed for QoS signaling.…”
Section: Rsvp and Nsismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to maintain the mobility handover process of network layer, firstly the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) has proposed various IP-based mobility management schemes, such as MIPv6, Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 (HMIPv6), and Fast MIPv6 (FMIPv6) [ 11 – 14 ]. The goal of these schemes is to maintain the communication continuity when an MN moves between different ARs [ 15 , 16 ]. However, these mobility protocols still have shortcomings in terms of handover latency, packet loss, and signaling overheads [ 16 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal of these schemes is to maintain the communication continuity when an MN moves between different ARs [ 15 , 16 ]. However, these mobility protocols still have shortcomings in terms of handover latency, packet loss, and signaling overheads [ 16 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the demand for high-speed vehicles pushed recent researches into a new direction, such as [8]. In that research, the authors propose a cross-layer hierarchical network mobility framework for all-IP networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%