2018
DOI: 10.4995/wpom.v9i1.9172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protocol: Literature review on the psychometric properties of the short versions of the scales of social desirability in the answers to competency self-assessment questionnaires

Abstract: <p class="Abstract">Research in business organization in general and talent management (in university or professional students) uses in many cases self-administered questionnaires as a source of data to assess people's competencies. In clinical psychology, it has been shown that self-evaluations of behaviors may present a bias of social desirability. However, even in this field of research it is not usual to measure its effect when taking data. Our work proposes a protocol to find a set of scales of soci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This great heterogeneity and dispersion are in line with the lack of consensus on the topic indicated in previous research (e.g. Chen, 2019; Marin-Garcia et al. , 2018a, b; Aslam et al.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This great heterogeneity and dispersion are in line with the lack of consensus on the topic indicated in previous research (e.g. Chen, 2019; Marin-Garcia et al. , 2018a, b; Aslam et al.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…, 2009; Gligor et al. , 2013; Marin-Garcia et al. , 2018a, b), many studies develop new scales, thus foregoing the advantages of applying a previous scale in different samples and contexts (Gligor et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our work is framed within descriptive literature review and scoping review typologies [35,53]. The procedure followed for our systematic literature review is based on previous recommendations and working practices according to other authors [25,45,[54][55][56][57][58][59][60]. The methodology can be consulted in detail in the published research protocol [61].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first step is the identification of the existing research papers which relate kaizen and green or clean production. Throughout this section, we describe the different phases that have been followed in the search [32,33].…”
Section: Inclusion and Exclusion Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%