2009
DOI: 10.1016/s1808-8694(15)30553-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protocol to collect late latency auditory evoked potentials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The P1-N1-P2 complex was identified in the record referent to the frequent stimulus and the P300 was identified in the record referent to the infrequent stimulus, as the positive wave of greatest amplitude following the P1-N1-P2 complex. Absolute latencies (ms) and amplitude (µV) of the P1, N1, P2, and P3 components were analyzed, according to previous studies: P1: 51,63±10,93ms, 0,62±0,34µV; N1: 81,38±20,11ms, -0,95±0,27µV; P2: 143,11±18,37ms, 0,81±0,41µV; P3: 341±23ms, 2,12±1,07µV 22,23 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The P1-N1-P2 complex was identified in the record referent to the frequent stimulus and the P300 was identified in the record referent to the infrequent stimulus, as the positive wave of greatest amplitude following the P1-N1-P2 complex. Absolute latencies (ms) and amplitude (µV) of the P1, N1, P2, and P3 components were analyzed, according to previous studies: P1: 51,63±10,93ms, 0,62±0,34µV; N1: 81,38±20,11ms, -0,95±0,27µV; P2: 143,11±18,37ms, 0,81±0,41µV; P3: 341±23ms, 2,12±1,07µV 22,23 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%