2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/icra.2017.7989057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proton 2: Increasing the sensitivity and portability of a visuo-haptic surface interaction recorder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1(a)) with an instrumented tool, as such data have previously been shown to reflect the friction, hardness, and texture of the surface being touched [25]. We prefer humanoperated rather than automatic haptic data collection because the hardware costs less and can be made portable for field use [3]. We carefully selected a set of C = 10 surface textures (Fig.…”
Section: Haptic-auditory Surface Recordingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1(a)) with an instrumented tool, as such data have previously been shown to reflect the friction, hardness, and texture of the surface being touched [25]. We prefer humanoperated rather than automatic haptic data collection because the hardware costs less and can be made portable for field use [3]. We carefully selected a set of C = 10 surface textures (Fig.…”
Section: Haptic-auditory Surface Recordingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We carefully selected a set of C = 10 surface textures (Fig. 1(b)) from the Penn Haptic Texture Toolkit [26] drawn from material categories that are also representative of other surface datasets [2], [3]; similar pairs of materials (e.g., wood and laminate) were purposefully included to make recognition more challenging.…”
Section: Haptic-auditory Surface Recordingsmentioning
confidence: 99%