1982
DOI: 10.1021/bi00260a020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proton nuclear magnetic resonance studies on cyclic nucleotide binding to the Escherichia coli adenosine cyclic 3',5'-phosphate receptor protein

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The good agreement between this conformation of unligated CRP and the experimental SANS curve does imply that this energy-minimized open form may indeed be the stable conformation of unligated CRP in solution. These results agree with NMR measurements, which show a tightening up of CRP into a more rigid protein upon cAMP binding (2). The magnitude of the change of approximately 1 Å in the radius of gyration also agrees with the 0.7 Ϯ 0.1 Å shrinkage observed in the Stokes radius of CRP upon ligation with cAMP (22).…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The good agreement between this conformation of unligated CRP and the experimental SANS curve does imply that this energy-minimized open form may indeed be the stable conformation of unligated CRP in solution. These results agree with NMR measurements, which show a tightening up of CRP into a more rigid protein upon cAMP binding (2). The magnitude of the change of approximately 1 Å in the radius of gyration also agrees with the 0.7 Ϯ 0.1 Å shrinkage observed in the Stokes radius of CRP upon ligation with cAMP (22).…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…The implication is that the asymmetry of the CRP dimer in the crystal lattice is due to crystal packing forces and that the structural change responsible for the activation of transcription is a change from the open to the closed form in solution. This is substantiated by NMR measurements on fluorinated derivatives of CRP, which imply that the conformational change involves the hinge region (1), and proton NMR measurements, which show that CRP in solution tightens up and becomes more rigid upon binding of cAMP (2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…3 also appears to rule out the hypothesis (32) that CAP-bound cAMP interacts directly with a DNA base pair in the recognition site. Although the results of crystallographic (21) and solution (33,34) experiments conflict regarding the glycosidic conformation of CAP-bound cAMP, both types of experiment agree that the cAMP binding site is located in a ,/roll structure comprised of amino acids 18-97 of CAP (21,34,35). In the alignment illustrated, the cAMP binding site is seen to be a minimum of 25 A from the DNA, thereby precluding a cAMP-DNA contact.…”
Section: And 6)mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Thus, the crystal structures reveal cAMP binds in an anti conformation to CAP (3) but in a syn conformation to PKA RI␣ (4), although this may not reflect the conformation of the ligand bound to the proteins in solution (1,2,19). While experiments with cyclic nucleotide analogs and modeling, based upon the CAP and PKA R1␣ structures, have been used to investigate the conformation adopted by agonists in other CNB sites, this issue is unresolved (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%