The muscarinic activity and rates of hydrolysis of a series of acetoxyethylamine derivatives were compared in an effort to explain the differences in potencies of the tertiary and quaternary amino esters. The more flexible compounds, like dimethylaminoethyl acetate (1 A), are much weaker muscarinic agents than their corresponding quaternary analogs ( lB), while rigid compounds, like aceclidine (6A), are more potent than their methochlorides. These differences may be rationalized in terms of a cyclic ammonium conformation which could readily be formed by the open chain derivatives, and which may also account for an anchimeric acceleration of the hydrolysis of the tertiary amino ester. Kinetic experiments have also provided evidence for the mechanism of this anchimerically assisted reaction.In a study investigating the effect of pH on the muscarinic activity of some tertiary amines, it was noted that the hydronium ions of oxotremorine, arecoline, and pilocarpine were more potent muscarinic agents than their N-Me quaternary salts.' A similar relationship has been reported for the tertiary amine aceclidine (3-acetoxyquinuclidine)z~3and some arecoline analog^.^ In contrast, the more classical cholinergic agents related to ACh are more active than the hydronium ions of their N-demethyl analogs.'-' In all the compounds whose tertiary derivatives are more effective than their N-Me quaternary analogs, the basic N is contained in a ring while in pairs of compounds in which the reverse is true the N is attached to an aliphatic chain.These differences have been rationalized in terms of the conformations of the 2 types of compounds in aqueous solution.' If interaction with the receptor requires that the C=O group and positively charged N be arranged in either a transoid or open chain conformation, the ease with which the compounds could attain this conformation should be reflected in their potency. Conversely, any molecular feature that opposed this conformation would be expected to decrease potency. In a flexible molecule like dimethylaminoethyl acetate (lA), the attraction between the proton on the charged N and the C=O could favor a large population of conformations in which these 2 groups are close together, while the more rigid cyclic compounds could assume these conformations only with difficulty. Because of their tendency to form cyclic conformations, the flexible tertiary amino esters would be less potent than their quaternary derivatives.that the cyclic ammonium structure (A) of dimethylaminoethyl acetate has an anchimeric effect on its alkaline hydrolysis. No such effect was observed with the alkaline hyThis postulate was based in part on the reports of Hansenstg drolysis of aceclidine because of the inability of this rigid molecule to attain a cyclic ammonium conformation.here, in which a comparison was made of the muscarinic activity and rates of hydrolysis of pairs of acetoxyethylamine derivatives with differing degrees of flexibility about the ethylamine side chain (Figure 1). Each pair consists of a tertiary am...