2005
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ProtTest: selection of best-fit models of protein evolution

Abstract: ProtTest is available under the GNU license from http://darwin.uvigo.es

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
1,979
0
10

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,803 publications
(1,996 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
7
1,979
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Using 81 curated sequences, multiple sequence alignments were inferred using MSAProbs (Liu, Schmidt, & Maskell, 2010) and MUSCLE (Edgar, 2004) with the default settings. Both of these alignments were best‐fit by the PROTCATWAG model (Lartillot & Philippe, 2004; Le & Gascuel, 2008), with model fitness assessed using the Akaike information criterion (Abascal, Zardoya, & Posada, 2005). The 81 protein sequences used in this study are available to download from the following URL: http://www.phylobot.com/582058404/RuBisCO.noalign.fasta …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using 81 curated sequences, multiple sequence alignments were inferred using MSAProbs (Liu, Schmidt, & Maskell, 2010) and MUSCLE (Edgar, 2004) with the default settings. Both of these alignments were best‐fit by the PROTCATWAG model (Lartillot & Philippe, 2004; Le & Gascuel, 2008), with model fitness assessed using the Akaike information criterion (Abascal, Zardoya, & Posada, 2005). The 81 protein sequences used in this study are available to download from the following URL: http://www.phylobot.com/582058404/RuBisCO.noalign.fasta …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used ProtTest [43] to select the best-fitting substitution matrix for our alignments of each of the four genes. In each case, the LG matrix [44] was chosen over the JTT [36] and WAG [37] matrices used in the original analysis by both the AIC and BIC criteria (see Table S1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ingroup was considered monophyletic with respect to the outgroup (O. vulgaris). We employed the partitions selected by Partition Finder Protein (see above), and the mtREV model for all partitions as selected by PROTTEST (Abascal et al, 2005) among the ones available in BEAST. The final Markov chain was run twice for 50 million generations, sampling every 1,000 generations and the first 5 million was discarded as part of the burn-in process, according to the convergence of chains checked with Tracer v.1.5.…”
Section: Estimation Of Divergence Timesmentioning
confidence: 99%