Providing Access to Urban Green Spaces: A Participatory Benefit-Cost Analysis in Spain

Abstract

The opening up of green spaces could provide significant benefits to society. This study develops a framework to assess the economic benefits and costs of public interventions providing citizen access to urban green spaces. The Thinking Fadura project in Getxo (Spain) was used as a case study. A method for participatory benefit-cost analysis is developed, where a stakeholder-participatory evaluation is combined with a standard cost-benefit analysis. The participatory evaluation followed a bottom-up approach in a sequential evaluation including three main focal points: key stakeholders and experts, visitors and the general public. The assessment demonstrates that the Thinking Fadura project's benefits outweigh the costs. The results suggest that projects designed with the purpose of improving green space accessibility to the general public can be beneficial from a societal perspective. The highest economic benefits were an increase in the amenity and recreational value and an increase in people's physical activity. The participatory evaluation indicates that giving access to people of lower socio-economic status and vulnerable groups and improving recreational use were perceived as the most beneficial. An increase in noise, dirt, and risk of criminal activities as well as potential conflicts between green space users were perceived as the most negative impacts of opening a previously restricted area to the general public. The economic assessment of Thinking Fadura project could serve as a model in the decision-making process in locations where the use of greenspaces is restricted.

Using an Intersectional Lens on Vulnerability and Resilience in Minority and/or Marginalized Groups During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Narrative Review

“…Additionally, the effects of climate change may affect those in crowded housing and with less access to urban green spaces and increase inequality even further, as discussed in an article with United States focus ( Bikomeye et al, 2021 ). Urban green spaces are enjoyed in varying degrees in different countries, as urban green spaces may be restricted in their access ( García de Jalón et al, 2020 ) or larger, desirable green spaces may not be available ( Wendel et al, 2011 ). Therefore, social inequality in terms of privilege and oppression should not only be considered at societal and individual levels and with regard to the specific context of a country or a state.…”

Statistical Approach to the Problem of Selecting the Most Appropriate Model for Managing Stormwater in Newly Designed Multi-Family Housing Estates

“…This may be due to the fact that the costs of building and operating the same system may differ depending on local conditions, as indicated by Song and Chung [55] for the example of South Korea. For this reason, it may be beneficial to perform a detailed cost (C) and benefit (B) analysis as part of the ongoing investment process and to determine the B/C ratio [56]. The obtained values of this ratio can be the basis for comparing different devices representing the same stormwater management model and for choosing the one for which the B/C ratio is the highest.…”

Assessing the role of urban green spaces for human well-being: a systematic review

“…The proximity to urban parks to lower socio-economic status and vulnerable groups with improved leisure activities was found the most advantageous. In contrast, noise and poor cleanliness are the most damaging effects of crime and possible tension for the general public (García de Jalón et al, 2020 ). By providing trails and benches with a canopy of vegetation, the benefits of urban green spaces can be improved (Madureira et al, 2018 ).…”